Sri Gayatri Academy for Technical Eduaction, Tadepalligudem V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, , Tadepalligudem

ITA 333/VIZ/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7417 (ITAT-VISAKHAPATNAM)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 10 month(s) 12 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 06-04-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 24-05-2019
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Question of law; Set aside
• Section: 143(3); 143(2); 139(1); 148

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM BEFORE SHRI N.K. CHOUDHRY, HONBLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 33 3/VIZ/2019 (ASST. YEAR : 2009 - 1 0 ) M/S. SRI GAYATRI ACADEMY FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION , 9 - 1 - 59/12, SRI BALAJI AGENCIES BUILDING , MAIN ROAD, TADEPALLIGUDEM . VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1 , TADEPALIGUDEM. PAN NO. AAAJT 2069 C (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : SHRI C.SUBRAHMANYAM , FC A DEPARTMENT BY : SMT.SUMAN MALIK, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 16 / 03 /2021 . DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 06 / 0 4 /2021 . O R D E R PER N.K. CHOUDHRY , JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20 / 03 /2019 IMPUGNED HEREIN PASSED BY THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) [FOR SHORT , LD. COMMISSIONER] , TIRUPATI U/SEC. 250(6) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS 'ACT') FOR THE A.Y. 20 09 - 1 0 . 2. T HE ASSESSEES CASE IS THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED ITS RETURN OF INCOME ON DATED 29/0 9 /2009 UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 139(1) OF 2 ITA NO. 333 / VIZ /2019 ( M/S. SRI GAYATRI ACADEMY FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ) THE ACT. THE DUE DATE FOR ISSUING NOTICE U/SEC. 143(2) FOR CONVERTING THE CASE INTO SCRUTINY WAS DATED 30/09/2010 , HOWEVER , INSTEAD OF CONVERTING THE CASE INTO SCRUTINY AND ISSUING N O TI C E U/SEC. 143(2), THE AO ISSUED NOTICE U/SEC. 148 ON DATED 12/04/2010 . AS THE TIME LIMIT WAS AVAILABLE TO THE AO TO CO MPLETE THE ASSESSMENT U /SEC. 143(3) BY ISSU I NG NOTICE U/SEC. 143(2) ON OR BEFORE THE STIPULATED DATE I.E. 30/09/2010 AS PROVIDED IN THE ACT , U P TO THAT TIME , THE CASE COULD HAVE BEEN CONVERTED INTO REGULAR SCRUTINY , HOWEVER, THE AO JUMPED INTO REOPENING OF THE CASE BY ISSUING NOTICE U/SEC. 148 OF THE ACT WITHOUT COMPLETING THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT . THEREFORE, AS PER MANDATE OF LAW AND THE PROPOSITIONS LAID DOWN BY VARIOUS COU R TS TO THE EFFECT THAT UNLESS THE RETURN OF INCOME ALREADY FILED IS DIS POSED OF, NOTICE FOR REASSESSMENT U/SEC. 148 OF THE ACT IS NOT WARRANTED. 3. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE ASSESSEE HAS DRAWN OUR ATTENTION TO THE ASSESSEES PETITION DATED 01/03/2021 FILED BEFORE BENCH AND SUBMITTED THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT PRESSING THE ORIGINAL GROUNDS OF APPEAL FILED ALONG WITH FORM NO.36, THEREFORE THE HON'BLE BENCH MAY CONSIDER THE SAID GROUNDS AS NOT PRESSED, HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE IS PRESSING ADDITIONAL GROUND FILED ON DATED 09/11/2020 BEFORE THE HONBLE ITAT BEING A LEGAL GROUND, WHICH IN FACT WAS NOT RAISED BEFORE THE LD. CIT(A), 4 . LD. DR REFUTED THE CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEE. 5 . HAVING HEARD THE PARTIES AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. THE ASSESSEE HAS RAISED THE ADDITION AL GROUND WHICH IS EXTRACTED BELOW: - ISSUE OF NOTICE U/SEC. 148 AND COMPLETING THE ASSESSMENT U/SEC. 143(3) R.W.S. 147 OF THE IT ACT IS BAD IN LAW, THEREFORE, THE IMPUGNED ORDER IS LIABLE TO BE QUASHED SINCE THE ASSESSMENT OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN COMPLETED U/SEC. 143(3) BY ISSUE OF NOTICE U/SEC. 143(2) OF THE IT ACT CONSIDERING THE AVAILABILITY OF STATUTORY TIME LIMIT FOR ISSUE OF SUCH NOTICE. 3 ITA NO. 333 / VIZ /2019 ( M/S. SRI GAYATRI ACADEMY FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ) 5 .1 . THE HON'BLE APEX COURT IN THE CASE OF NTPC VS. CIT [229 ITR 383 (SC)] WHILE CONSIDER ING THE FRESH CLAIM MADE BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE FIRST TIME BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL BY WAY OF AN ADDITIONAL GROUND, LAID DOWN THE FOLLOWING PROPOSITIONS: - 7. .......... UNDOUBTEDLY, THE TRIBUNAL WILL HAVE THE DISCRETION TO ALLOW OR NOT ALLOW A NEW GROUND TO BE RAISED. BUT WHERE THE TRIBUNAL IS ONLY REQUIRED TO CONSIDER A QUESTION OF LAW ARISING FROM THE FACTS WHICH ARE ON RECORD IN THE ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS WE FAIL TO SEE WHY SUCH A QUESTION SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE RAISED WHEN IT IS NECESSARY TO CONSIDER THAT QUESTION IN ORDER TO CORRECTLY ASSESS THE TAX LIABILITY OF AN ASSESSEE . 5 .2. AS THE ASSESSEE HAS RAISED A LEGAL GROUND WHICH IS ARISING FROM THE FACTS ALREADY ON RECORD IN THE ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS , HENCE WE ARE INCLINED TO ALLOW THE ASSESSEE TO RAISE THE ADDITIONAL GROUND AND CONSEQUENTLY THE ADDITIONAL GROUND RAISED IS ADMITTED FOR HEARING. THE LD. AR FAIRLY SUBMITTED THAT THE ADDITIONAL GROUND FILED ON DATED 09/ 11/2020 WAS NOT RAISED BEFORE THE LD. COMMISSIONER THEREFORE THE LD. COMMISSIONER CAN BE DIRECTED TO ADJUDICATE THE ADDITIONAL GROUND. C ONSIDERING THE PECULIAR FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, AS THE DECISION OF THE ISSUE REQUIRES ELABORATE DISCUSSION OF MATERIAL FACTS, WE CONSIDER IT APPROPRIATE TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LD. COMMISSIONER AND TO REMAND THE CASE BACK TO THE FILE OF THE LD. COMMISSIONER FOR DECISION AFRESH ON THE ADDITIONAL GROUND RAISED BEFORE BENCH . CONSEQUENTLY, THE CASE STANDS REMANDED BACK TO THE LD. COMMISSIONER ON THE AFORESAID TERMS. 6 . IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE STANDS ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON TH IS 0 6 T H DAY OF APRIL , 2021 . S D / - S D / - (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) ( N.K. CHOUDHRY ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 0 6 T H APRIL , 20 2 1 . 4 ITA NO. 333 / VIZ /2019 ( M/S. SRI GAYATRI ACADEMY FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ) VR/ - COPY TO: 1. THE ASSESSEE - M/S. SRI GAYATRI ACADEMY FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION, 9 - 1 - 59/12, SRI BALAJI AGENCIES BUILDING, MAIN ROAD, TADEPALLIGUDEM. 2. THE REVENUE ITO, WARD - 1, TADEPALIGUDEM. 3. THE CIT (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD. 4. THE CIT(A) , TIRUPATI . 5. THE D.R . , VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER (VUKKEM RAMBABU) SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY, ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM.