SHAYAM AGARWAL, Jaipur V. CIT, Jaipur

ITA 334/JPR/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 128 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9675 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 11 month(s) 14 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-03-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 01-04-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH DQY HKKJR] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS [KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YAD AV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 556/JP/2014 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10. SHYAM AGARWAL, S/O SHRI RAM AGARWAL, 129-E, GOVIND NAGAR, DUSHERRA KOTHI, AMBER ROAD, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN NO. ADIPA 5475 E VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 334/JP/2013 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09. SHYAM AGARWAL, S/O SHRI RAM AGARWAL, 129-E, GOVIND NAGAR, DUSHERRA KOTHI, AMBER ROAD, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN NO. ADIPA 5475 E VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT CORRIGENDUM IT IS NOTICED THAT SOME TYPOGRAPHICAL MISTAKES HAVE OCCURRED IN PARA 3, 4, 5 & 6 UNDER THE HEAD : FIRST WE TAKE ITA NO. 556/JP/2014 WHICH READS AS UNDER :- ON THE CONTRARY, THE LD. AR OF THE ASSESEE HAS SU BMITTED THAT HE DOES NOT WANT TO PROSECUTE THIS APPEAL, THEREFORE, HE PRAYED TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. THE ABOVE QUOTED SUBMISSION OF THE ASSESSEE IS SUBS TITUTED AS AS UNDER :- ON THE CONTRARY, THE LD. A/R HAS NOT OBJECTED THE ADJOURNMENT SOUGHT BY THE LD. D/R. 2 ITA NO. 556/JP/2014 & ITA NO.334/JP/2013 SHRI SHYAM AGARWAL, JAIPUR. ACCORDINGLY PARA 4 OF THE ORDER IS SUBSTITUTED AND BE READ AS UNDER :- 4. WE, THEREFORE, ADJOURN THE HEARING AND FIX THI S APPEAL FOR HEARING ON 14.03.2017. PARA 5 OF THE ORDER IS ALSO SUBSTITUTED AND BE READ AS UNDER : 5. REGARDING ANOTHER APPEAL BEING ITA NO. 334/JP/ 2013, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS SUBMITTED THAT HE DOES NOT WANT TO PROSECUTE THIS APPEAL, THEREFORE, HE PR AYED TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. 5.1. THE LD. CIT D/R HAS NOT RAISED ANY OBJECTION O N THE WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THEREFORE WE PERMIT THE ASSESEE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. FINALLY, THE PARA 6 IS SUBSTITUTED AND BE READ AS U NDER :- 6. IN THE RESULT, ITA NO. 334/JP/2013 IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. EXCEPT THE ABOVE CHANGES AS MENTIONED ABOVE, THERE IS NO OTHER CHANGE IN THE ABOVE CAPTIONED ORDER. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO ( DQY HKKJR ) (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) ( KUL BHARAT ) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER JAIPUR DATED:- 15/03/2017. D/ 3 ITA NO. 556/JP/2014 & ITA NO.334/JP/2013 SHRI SHYAM AGARWAL, JAIPUR. VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSF'KR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE APPELLANT- SHRI SHYAM AGARWAL, JAIPUR. 2. THE RESPONDENT- THE DCIT/CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR. 3. THE CIT(A). 4. THE CIT, 5. THE DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 556/JP/2014 & 334/JP/2013/JP /2013) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR