SAIGAL SEATRADE, MUMBAI V. ADDL CIT RG 18(1), MUMBAI

ITA 3341/MUM/2009

• Counselvise Citation: [2010] 136 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1387 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 1 month(s) 10 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 30-06-2010
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: E
• Next Hearing Date: 30-05-2011
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 20-05-2009
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: D SONGATE

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES E, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, AM AND SHRI V.DURGA RAO, JM ITA NO.3341/MUM/2009 : ASST.YEAR 2006-2007 M/S.SAIGAL SEATRADE B/203 NEELAM CENTRE HIND CYCLE ROAD, WORLI MUMBAI 400 025. PA NO.AAAFS6920K. VS. THE ADDL.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX RANGE 18(1) MUMBAI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : --- NONE --- RESPONDENT BY : SHRI D.SONGATE O R D E R PER R.S.SYAL, AM : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE ARISES OUT OF THE ORDE R PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS) ON 27.02.2009 IN RELATION TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007. 2. THE HEARING OF THIS APPEAL WAS FIXED ON 23.06.20 10. HOWEVER, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR HAS IT MOVED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT, INSPITE OF NOTICE. IT IS, THEREFORE, P RESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, BY APPLYING THE RATIO LAID DOWN BY THE ITAT DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P.) LTD. [(1991) 38 ITD 320], WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE APPELLANT-ASSE SSEE AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 30 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2010. SD/- SD/- (V.DURGA RAO) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI : 30 TH JUNE, 2010 . DEVDAS* ITA NO.3341/MUM/2009 M/S.SAIGAL SEATRADE. 2 COPY TO : 1. THE APPELLANT. 2. THE RESPONDENTS. 3. THE CIT CONCERNED 4. THE CIT(A)-XVIII, MUMBAI. 5. THE DR/ITAT, MUMBAI. 6. GUARD FILE. TRUE COPY. BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI.