M/s NU Look Finance & Leasing Ltd., New Delhi V. ITO, New Delhi

ITA 3360/DEL/2011

• Counselvise Citation: 336020114 RSA 2011
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 6 month(s) 2 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 31-12-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: E
• Next Hearing Date: 21-12-2015
• Assessment Year: 1999-2000
• Appeal Filed On: 28-06-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: P DAM KANUNJNA

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES: E NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDI CIAL MEMBER ITA NO: 3360/DEL/2011 AY : - 1999-2000 NU LOOK FINANCE & LEASING LTD. VS. ITO 101-D, POCKET-F, WARD-13(3) GTB ENCLAVE NEW DELHI. NEW DELHI - 110 093 PAN : AAACN4987A (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI P. DAM KANUNJNA DATE OF HEARING : 21.12.2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 31.12.2015 O R D E R PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.3.2011 OF CIT(A)-XVI, NEW DELHI. 2. THE CASE WAS EARLIER FIXED FOR HEARING ON 17.1 1.2014, 6.4.2015, 22.5.2015, 31.8.2015. NONE ATTENDED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE BEFORE US. NO APPLICATION WAS MOVED SEEKING ADJOURNMENT OF THE CASE. 3. IN THE PECULIAR FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES AND KEEP ING IN VIEW THE PROVISIONS OF ORDER V RULE 19A OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUN AL RULES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 3 8 ITD 320 (DEL); AND LATE TUKOJI ITA NO. 3360/DEL/2011 NU LOOK FINANCE & LEASING LTD. VS. ITO 2 RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 480 (MP), CIT VS. B.N. BHA TTACHARGEE AND ANOTHER, REPORTED IN 118 ITR 461 [RELEVANT PAGES 477 & 478], LATE MR S. BANU E COWASJI VS. CIT 276 ITR 594 (MP) WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE AS SESSEE. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYIN G FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED . 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESS EE IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 31. 12.2015. SD/- SD/- (J. SUDHAKAR REDDY) (SUDHA NSHU SRIVASTAVA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDIC IAL MEMBER DATED: THE 31.12.2015 VEENA COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER DY. REGISTRAR ITA NO. 3360/DEL/2011 NU LOOK FINANCE & LEASING LTD. VS. ITO 3 SL. NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1. DATE OF DICTATION BY THE AUTHOR 29.12.2015 2. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER 29.12. 2015 3. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER 4. DRAFT APPROVED BY THE SECOND MEMBER 5. DATE OF APPROVED ORDER COMES TO THE SR. PS 6. DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER 7. DATE OF FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK 8. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK 9. DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER