IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH E NEW DELHI. BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV AND SHRI K.G. BANSAL I.T.A. NO.3397(DEL)/2011 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2001-02 M/S MEHBRO CABLE & CONDUCTORS, INCOME-T AX OFFICER, 1826, BHAGIRATH PALACE, VS. C OY. WARD 6(3), NEW DELHI. DELHI-6. PAN: AAACM3433C (APPLICANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : S HRI R.S. NEGI, SR. D.R. DATE OF HEARIN G: 07.02.2012 DATE OF PRONOUN CEMENT: 07.02.2012. ORDER PER K.G. BANSAL : A.M THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE ARISES OUT OF THE O RDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(APPEALS)-IX, NEW DELHI PASSED IN APPEAL NO. 30/06-07, DATED 11.02.2011, UNDER THE PROVISIONS O F SECTION 271(1)(C) OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961. 2. IN THIS CASE, THE APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 30.08.2011 AS PER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT-CUM-NOTICE DATED 01.07.2011. NONE A PPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE ON 30.08.2011, BUT AT THE REQUEST OF THE LD. DR THE APPEAL WAS ADJOURNED TO 07.02.2012. NOTICE FOR HEARING THE APPEAL ON 07.02.2012 WAS ISSUED ON 16.11.2011. WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED OUT FOR HEARING ON 07.02.2012, NONE ATTENDED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSE SSEE. NO APPLICATION FOR ITA NO.3397(DEL)/2011 2 ADJOURNMENT WAS ALSO RECEIVED. IT SEEMS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO DISMISSED AS UNADMIT TED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION, IN VIEW OF THE DECISIONS IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., 38 ITD 320(DEL) AND ESTATE OF LATE TUKAJIRAO H OLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (M.P). RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THESE C ASES, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. SD/- SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) (K.G. BANSAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SP SATIA COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. MEHBRO CABLE & CONDUCTORS, NEW DELHI. 2. ITO, COY. WARD 6(3), NEW DELHI. 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT, 5. THE DR, ITAT, NEW DELHI. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.