IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR. BEFORE SH. A.D.JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. B.P. JAIN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. NOS. 342 & 343 (ASR)/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR: ......... P AN: AAMTS1218G SHRI SHRI JAGAT AMBA SHARIKA CHAKRESHAWARI ASTHAPAN, HARIPARBAT DEVI ANGA, HAWAL, SRINAGAR, KASHMIR. VS. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU AND KASHMIR, RAID HEAD COMPLEX, PANAMA CHOWK, JAMMU. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY: SH. TARSEM LAL, DR DATE OF HEARING: 16.03.2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 17.03.2015 ORDER PER B.P. JAIN, AM. 1. EARLIER, BOTH THE CASES WERE FIXED FOR HEARING ON 13.01.2015 BUT BOTH THE CASES WERE ADJOURNED ON THE REQUEST OF DR. DESPITE THE ISSUANCE OF NOTICE FOR TODAY, 16.03.2015 TO THE ASS ESSEE, FOR HEARING, NOBODY TURNED UP ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THEREFO RE, CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RUL E 19(2) OF THE INCOME-TAX (APPELLATE TRIBUNAL) RULES, 1963, AS WER E CONSIDERED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. REPORTED I N 38 ITD I.T.A. NOS. 342 & 343 (ASR)/2014 2 320(DEL.), WE TREAT THESE APPEALS AS UN-ADMITTED. A CCORDINGLY, THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYIN G FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPL IANCE, ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS, ETC., THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED. 2. IN THE RESULT, BOTH THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSE E ARE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COU RT ON 17 TH MARCH, 2015. SD/- SD/- (A.D. JAIN) (B.P . JAIN) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 17 TH MARCH, 2015 /PK/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1.THE ASSESSEE: SHRI SHRI JAGAT AMBA SHARIKA CHAKR ESHAWARI ASTHAPAN, HARIPARBAT DEVI ANGA, HAWAL, SRINAGAR, KASHMIR . 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, J&K . 3. THE CIT(A), 4. THE CIT, 5. THE SR DR, I.T.A.T., TRUE COPY BY ORDER (ASSISTANT REGISTRAR) INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AMRITSAR BENCH: AMRITSAR.