SARAH FAISAL HAWA, MUMBAI V. ACIT 21(3), MUMBAI

ITA 3436/MUM/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 128 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0306 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 14-06-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 13-06-2017
• Assessment Year: 2005-2006
• Appeal Filed On: 05-06-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RAJAT MITTAL
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH C, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI G.S.PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAM LAL NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NOS.3436,3437,3438&3439/MUM/2015 (ASSESSMENT YEARS 2005-06,2006-07, 2008-09 & 2009 -10) SMT. SARAH FAISAL HAWA, 24, CENTRAL COURT, AGRIPADA, MUMBAI 400 011 PAN: AAIPH 0012P ...... APPELLANT VS. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 21(3), PIRAMAL CHAMBERS, MUMBAI. .... RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : SHRI K.GOPAL RESPONDENT BY : SHRI RAJAT MITTAL DATE OF HEARING : 14/06/2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 14/06/2017 ORDER PER G.S.PANNU,A.M: THE CAPTIONED APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE PERTA INING TO THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2005-06,2006-07, 2008-09 & 2009-1 0 ARE DIRECTED AGAINST SEPARATE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER UNDER SECTION 143(3) R.W.S. 254 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (IN SHORT THE ACT) DATED 31/03/2015. 2. THE LD. REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ASSESSEE VIDE LE TTER DATED 14 TH JUNE, 2017 HAS REQUESTED FOR GRANT OF PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THESE APPEALS. THE CONTENTS OF THE LETTER READ AS UNDER:- 2 ITA NOS.3436,3437,3438&3439/MUM/2015 THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE ABOVE MENTIONED APPEAL ON 05/06/2015 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31/03/2015 PASSED BY LD. A.O UNDER SECT ION 143(3) R.W.S. 254 OF THE ACT. THE ASSESSEE HAS INSTRUCTED US NOT TO PURSUE THE ABOVE MENTIONED APPEALS. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND UNDER THE INSTRUCTIONS FRO M OUR ABOVE MENTIONED CLIENT, WE SEEK PERMISSION OF HONBLE BENCH TO WITHDRAW THE ABOVE APPEALS. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE REQUEST YOUR HONOURS TO KI NDLY ALLOW US TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL AND OBLIGE. 3. LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE AFORESAID REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE. 3. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DIS MISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 14/06/2 017 SD/- SD/- (RAM LAL NEGI ) (G.S. PANNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOCUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED 14/06/2017 VM , SR. PS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT , 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(A)- 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, MUMBAI