M/s. Uttam Sugar Mills Ltd., New Delhi V. Pr. CIT, Uttar Pradesh

ITA 3444/DEL/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6693 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 2 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 30-07-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 29-05-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: S S RANA
• Assessee Lawyers: LOK SHAY GOYAL
• Section: 263

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH G , NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. N. K. SAINI, AM AND SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA , JM ITA NO. 3439 /DEL/201 5 : ASSTT. YEAR : 2005 - 06 ITA NO. 3440/DEL/2015 : ASSTT. YEAR : 2006 - 07 ITA NO. 3441/DEL/2015 : ASSTT. Y EAR : 2007 - 08 ITA NO. 3442/DEL/2015 : ASSTT. YEAR : 2008 - 09 ITA NO. 3443/DEL/2015 : ASSTT. YEAR : 2009 - 10 ITA NO. 3444/DEL/2015 : ASSTT. YEAR : 2010 - 11 ITA NO. 3445/DEL/2015 : ASSTT. YEAR : 2011 - 12 M/S UT TAM SUGAR MILLS LTD., C/O M/S RRA TAXINDIA, D - 28, SOUTH EXTENSION, PART - I, NEW DELHI - 110049 VS PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL, KANPUR (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN NO. A A ACU2186Q ASSESSEE BY : SH. LOK SHAY GOYAL, ADV. & SH. DEEPESH GARG, ADV. REVENUE BY : SH. S. S. RANA, CIT DATE OF HEARING : 30.07 .201 8 DATE OF PRONOUNCE MENT : 30 .07 .201 8 ORDER PER BENCH : THESE APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE ARE D IRECTED AGAINST THE SEPARATE ORDERS EACH DATED 20.03.2015 OF LD. PR. CIT(CENTRAL), KANPUR. 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, T HE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT HE HAS THE INSTRUCTION NOT TO PRESS THESE APPEALS AND GAVE IN WRITING AS UN DER: R ESPECTED SIR , IN REFERENCE OF ABOVE WE HEREBY SUBMIT THAT WE HAD SUBMITTED ABOVE SAID APPEALS IN YOUR GOOD OFFICE AGAINST ORDER DATED 20.03.2015 PASSED UNDER SECTION 263 BY ITA NO S. 3439 TO 3445 /DE L /2015 UTTAM SUGAR MILLS LTD. 2 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL, KANPUR. HOWEVER, IN VIEW OF THE PRE SENT STATUS, WE HAVE DECIDED TO WITHDRAW THE AFORESAID APPEALS. THEREFORE, YOU ARE REQUESTED TO TREAT THEM AS NONEXISTENT. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE YOU ARE REQUESTED TO PLEASE WITHDRAW THE ABOVE 7 APPEALS AND STOP THE PROCEEDINGS OF APPEALS. THANKING YOU, FOR UTTAM SUGAR MILLS LIMITED SD/ - ( EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ) 3. THE LD. DR DID NOT OBJECT IF THE APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 5. IN THE RESULT, TH E APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED. (ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 30 /07/2018 ) SD/ - SD/ - ( SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA ) (N. K. SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DAT ED: 30 /07/2018 *SUBODH* CO PY FORWARDED TO: 1 . APPELLANT 2 . RESPONDENT 3 . CIT 4 . CIT(APPEALS) 5 . DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR