PRAKASH MAKHIJA, Kota V. ACIT, Jaipur

ITA 345/JPR/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 127 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1851 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 7 month(s) 22 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 29-11-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 22-06-2017
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 07-04-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: VARINDER MEHTA CIT DHK

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR JH HKKXPAN] YS[KK LNL; ,OA JH DQY HKKJR ] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI BHAGCHAND, AM & SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 345/JP/2016 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12 PRAKASH MAKHIJA, PROP- M/S YASH TRADERS, OLD DHAN MANDI, KOTA. CUKE VS. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: ACSPP 3796 N VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY : SHRI VARINDER MEHTA (CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 29/11/2017 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 29/11/2017 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: BHAGCHAND, A.M. THIS IS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE EMANATES F ROM THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-4, JAIPUR DATED 21/01/2016 FOR TH E 2011-12, WHEREIN THE ASSESSEE HAS RAISED ONLY ONE GROUND OF APPEAL, WHICH IS AGAINST CONFIRMING THE ADDITION OF RS.20,00,000/- AS UNDISC LOSED INVESTMENT IN THE MINES. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NO ONE HAS APPEARED ON B EHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. FROM THIS, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE I S NOT INTERESTED TO ITA 345/JP/2016_ PRAKASH MAKHIJA VS ACIT 2 PURSUE HIS CASE. SO IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., AND ALSO ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480 ( MP), THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS NOT ADMITTED AND IS DISMISSED AS LIMINE AS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 29/11/2017. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 29/11/2017. SD/- SD/- DQY HKKJR HKKXPAN (KUL BHARAT) (BHAGCHAND) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 29 TH NOVEMBER, 2017 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SHRI PRAKASH MAKHIJA, KOTA. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE A.C.I.T., CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 345/JP/2016) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR