Appeal Details
Counselvise Citation
[2016] 132 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8948 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Duration Of Justice
2 year(s) 4 month(s) 21 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date
05-07-2016
Appeal Filed By
Assessee
Order Result
Dismissed
Bench Allotted
B
Next Hearing Date
05-07-2016
Assessment Year
2008-2009
Appeal Filed On
14-02-2014
Judgement Text
, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , B B ENCH, CHENNAI . , . , $ % BEFORE SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI G.PAVAN KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.346/MDS/2014 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2008-09) M/S. KAAR TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD. 5/38, NGO COLONY, DINDIGUL VS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANY CIRCLE-II, RANGE II MADURAI. PAN: AACCK7322E ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : MR. S.SRIDHAR, ADVOCATE /RESPONDENT BY : MR.SUPRIO PAL, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 5 TH JULY, 2016 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 5 TH JULY, 2016 / O R D E R PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, AM:- THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II , MADURAI DATED 22.03.2013 PASSED UNDER SECTION 263 O F THE ACT. 2. AT THE OUTSET, THE LEARNED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTA TIVE SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PU RSUING THE APPEAL AND THEREFORE THE APPEAL IS NOT PRESSED. 2 ITA NO.346/MDS/2014 3. THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE LEARNED AU THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. 4. HENCE, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE 5 TH JULY, 2016 SD/- SD/- ( . ) ( . ) (G.PAVAN KUMAR) ( A.MOHAN A LANKAMONY ) # % / JUDICIAL MEMBER % / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER # /CHENNAI, ( /DATED 5 TH JULY, 2016 SOMU *+ ,+ /COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. - () /CIT(A) 4. - /CIT 5. + 1 /DR 6. /GF
