PAWAN KU. SHARMA, Jaipur V. ITO, Jaipur

ITA 348/JPR/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2014] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 78100 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 3 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-07-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 08-12-2011
• Assessment Year: 2005-2006
• Appeal Filed On: 20-04-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: D C SHARMA

Judgement Text

1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR (BEFORE SHRI R.P. TOLANI AND SHRI T.R. ME ENA) ITA NO. 348/JP/2011 ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2005-06 PAN : AGWPS 2453 F SHRI PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA VS. THE ITO 32, BHURA PATEL NAGAR, WARD- 2 (4) AJMER ROAD, JAIPUR JAIPUR (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE (A.D. ON RECORD) DEPARTMENT BY: SHRI D.C. SHARMA DATE OF HEARING: 21-07-2014 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 21-07-2014 ORDER PER R.P. TOLANI, JM THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST T HE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-1, JAIPUR DATED 19-09-2008 FOR THE ASSESS MENT YEAR 2005-06. 2. IN SPITE OF THE NOTICE SENT BY THE TRIBUNAL, THE CASE WAS NOT REPRESENTED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN IT WAS C ALLED FOR HEARING. FROM THIS, IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTE D TO PURSUE HIS CASE. SO IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BE NCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., [1991] 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO ON THE JUDGEMENT OF THE HON'BLE M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE C ASE OF ESTATE OF LATE 2 TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT [1997] 223 ITR 480, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS NOT ADMITTED AND IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE AS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 21-07-2014 SD/- SD/- (T.R. MEENA) (R.P. TOLANI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER JAIPUR DATED: 21 ST JULY, 2014 *MISHRA COPY FORWARDED TO:- 1. SHRI PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA, JAIPUR 2. THE ITO, WARD- 2 (4), JAIPUR 3. THE LD. CIT 4. THE LD. CIT(A), JAIPUR 5..THE LD. DR 6.THE GUARD FILE (IT NO. 348/JP/2011) BY ORDER AR ITAT, JAIPUR 3 4