Shri Maheshbhai Nanjibhai Patel(HUF), Surat V. The ACIT.,Circle-9, Surat

ITA 3498/AHD/2008

• Counselvise Citation: [2010] 136 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6153 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 7 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 17-06-2010
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 17-06-2010
• Assessment Year: 2000-2001
• Appeal Filed On: 22-10-2008
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: GAURAV BATHAM

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH D AHMEDABAD BEFORE S/SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND D. C. AGRAWAL, AM ITA NO.3498/AHD/2008 ASST. YEAR : 2000-01 SHRI MAHESHBHAI NANJIBHAI PATEL (HUF), 27, NILKAMAL PARK SOCIETY, VARACHHA ROAD, SURAT. VS. ASSTT. CIT, CIR.9, SURAT. PAN :AAJHM 7197 R (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SHRI GAURAV BATHAM, DR O R D E R PER D.C. AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER . THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A)-V SURAT, DATED 26-09-2008 RELATING TO ASSES SMENT YEAR 2000-01. 2. THE ASSESSEE IS SERVED, HOWEVER, ON THE DATE OF HEARING NOBODY APPEARED FOR THE ASSESSEE. CASUAL ADJOURNMENT APPLI CATIONS HAVE BEEN FILED SEVERAL TIMES IN THE PAST AND THE TRIBUNAL HA D PASSED FOR EXAMPLE DATED 10.03.2009, 20.06.2009 & 27.03.2010. IT SEEMS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT VERY SERIOUS IN PURSUING THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF ITAT DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT VS MULTIPLA N INDIA (PVT.) LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL) WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSES SEE IN LIMINE. 2 3. IN THE RESULT, THE ASSESSEES APPEAL STANDS DISM ISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 17/06/2010 SD/- SD/- (MAHAVIR SINGH) (D. C. AGRAWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD, DATED 17/06/2010. MAHATA/- COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT CONCERNED 4. THE CIT(A) CONCERNED 5. THE DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER D Y. REGISTRAR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD