SMT SMT MUMTAZ BEGUM, RAIPUR (CG) V. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2),RAIPUR, RAIPUR (CG)

ITA 35/BIL/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 107 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2528 (ITAT-RAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 6 month(s) 24 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 29-10-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 04-04-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: IS DIRECTED AGAINS T PASSED

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR VIRTUAL COURT BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 35/RPR/2017 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2012-13 MUMTAZ BEGUM, HOUSE NO.37/249, GOLE BAZAR, RAIPUR, RAIPUR (C.G.)-492001 PAN : AIQPB9272R VS. ITO, WARD-4(2), RAIPUR APPELLANT RESPONDENT / ORDER THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE CIT(A)-II, RAIPUR ON 25.01.2017 IN RELA TION TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13. 2. BEFORE US, THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED A LETTER DATED 04.10 .2021 SEEKING WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. THE RELEVANT CONTENTS OF SU CH LETTER READS AS UNDER : 1. THE ABOVE MENTIONED APPEAL WAS FILED ON 04.04.2 017. 2. IN THIS REGARD, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT IN RESPECT OF ABOVE APPEAL, WE HAVE FILED A DECLARATION UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 BEFORE THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY. WE ARE ENCLOSING HEREWIT H A COPY OF FORM NO.1 & 2 SUBMITTED BY APPELLANT UNDER DTVSV ACT, 20 20. AGAINST THE DECLARATION FILED, LD. PR. CIT HAS ALSO ISSUED FORM NO.3. COPY OF FORM 3 IS ALSO ENCLOSED. ASSESSEE BY SHRI BIKRAM SINGH REVENUE BY SHRI G.N. SINGH DATE OF HEARING 29-10-2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 29-10-2021 ITA NO.35/RPR/2017 MUMTAZ BEGUM 2 3. IN VIEW OF DECLARATION HAVING BEEN FILED UNDER D TVSV ACT, 2020, THE APPELLANT WISHES TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL F ILED. THEREFORE, IT IS REQUESTED THAT THE ASSESSEE MAY KINDLY BE PERMIT TED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. 3. THE LD. DR DID NOT RAISE ANY OBJECTION TO THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. AS SUCH, THE ASSESSEE IS PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 29 TH OCTOBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VIC E PRESIDENT PUNE; DATED : 29 TH OCTOBER, 2020 SATISH / COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT; 2. / THE RESPONDENT; 3. ( ) / THE CIT (APPEALS)-II, RAIPUR 4. THE PR.CIT-II, RAIPUR 5. DR, ITAT, RAIPUR; 6. / GUARD FILE. // TRUE COPY // / BY ORDER, // TRUE COPY // SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY , / ITAT, PUNE ITA NO.35/RPR/2017 MUMTAZ BEGUM 3 DATE 1. DRAFT DICTATED ON 29-10-2021 SR.PS 2. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHOR 29-10-2021 SR.PS 3. DRAFT PROPOSED & PLACED BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER JM 4. DRAFT DISCUSSED/APPROVED BY SECOND MEMBER. JM 5. APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.PS/PS SR.PS 6. KEPT FOR PRONOUNCEMENT ON SR.PS 7. DATE OF UPLOADING ORDER SR.PS 8. FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK SR.PS 9. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK 10. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE A.R. 11. DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER.