PARMOD KUMAR, NEW DELHI V. ITO WARD 45(2), NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

ITA 3533/DEL/2023

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 101 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8866 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-02-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 28-01-2024
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 06-12-2023
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Opportunity of being heard; Set aside
• Section: 271(1)(c)

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH, ‘SMC’: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.3533/Del/2023 (Assessment Year: 2011-12) Parmod Kumar, vs. ITO, Ward 45 (2), C-9, 9553, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi. New Delhi – 110 070. (PAN : AFUPK6599M) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri G.S. Kohli, CA REVENUE BY : Shri Om Prakash, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 29.01.2024 Date of Order : 02.02.2024 ORDER This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)/ National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 08.11.2023 for the Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. Although assessee has raised various issues, ld. Counsel of the assessee submitted that this appeal is against the penalty levied and confirmed by the ld. CIT (A) under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’). 3. Ld. Counsel pleaded that in the quantum appeal in assessee’s own case, the matter has been remanded by the ITAT to the file of AO. Hence, he submitted that penalty order should also be remanded to the AO for consideration afresh. 2 ITA No.3533/Del/20123 4. Per contra, ld. DR for the Revenue did not have any objection to this proposition. 5. Upon careful consideration, I find that this Tribunal in assessee’s own case in quantum appeal has concluded as under :- “ Considering the totality of the facts and the material placed before me, there is no dispute with regard to the fact that the AO had applied profit rate @ 25% of the gross receipts, meaning thereby the AO has treated the cash deposit into the bank accounts as business receipts of the assessee. Hence, the AO, in my considered view, ought to have examined the past history and the profit declared by similarly situated assessees. Under these facts the orders of the authorities below cannot be sustained. Hence, I hereby set aside the impugned order and restore the assessment to the file of the AO to make assessment afresh, in accordance with law, after making due inquiry regarding business carried out by the assessee and also take into consideration the past history of the profit declared by the assessee. Needless to say, the AO will provide adequate opportunity to the assessee of being heard. Grounds raised in this appeal are allowed for statistical purposes.” Since the quantum appeal has been remanded to the AO, I also deem it appropriate to remand this issue to the file of AO. Needless to add, assessee should be granted adequate opportunity of being heard. 6. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 2 nd day of February, 2024. Sd/- (SHAMIM YAHYA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated the 2 nd day of February, 2024 TS 3 ITA No.3533/Del/20123 Copy forwarded to: 1.Appellant 2.Respondent 3.CIT 4.CIT (A) 5.CIT(ITAT), New Delhi. AR, ITAT NEW DELHI.