Ajanta Raj Protens Ltd., V. DCIT, Co. Circle-1(2),

ITA 3544/DEL/2002

• Counselvise Citation: [2010] 136 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8175 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 7 year(s) 5 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-02-2010
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: E
• Next Hearing Date: 03-02-2010
• Assessment Year: 1998-1999
• Appeal Filed On: 02-09-2002
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: G S SAHOTA

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH `E NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI A.D. JAIN AND SHRI B.P. JAIN ITA NO. 3544(DEL)2002 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 1998-99 M/S. AJANTA RAJ PROTEINS LTD. DY.COMMI SSIONER OF INCOME TAX, 287, KOOCHA GHASE RAM, V. COY. CIR. 1(2), NEW DELHI. CHANDNI CHOWK, DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI G.S. SAHOTA, SR.DR. ORDER PER A.D. JAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)-IV, NEW DELHI DATED 13.02.2002. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE T IME OF HEARING. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE AT THE A DDRESS GIVEN IN THE MEMO OF THE APPEAL, WHICH HAS BEEN RETURNED WITH A POST AL REMARK LEFT WITHOUT ADDRESS. IT SEEMS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERES TED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPIN G IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA L TD. REPORTED IN 38 ITD ITA 3544(DEL)02 2 320(DEL), WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UN-ADMITTED. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR REC ALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER S HALL BE RECALLED. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSE D. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 3.02.2010. SD/- SD/- (B.P. JAIN) (A.D. JAIN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 3.02.2010 *RM COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR TRUE COPY BY ORDER DEPUTY REGISTRAR .