INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH G: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT ME MBER ITA NOS.:-3548,3549/DEL/2016 ASSESSMENT YEARS: 2010-11, 2011-12 O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, J.M. THE AFORESAID APPEALS HAVE BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSE E AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)- IV, KANPUR VIDE ORDER DATED 3 1.3.2016 PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEARS 2010-11, 2011-12. 2. IN THIS CASE NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE ASSESSEE FOR HEARING BY REGD. AD POST FOR 13.3.2018 AT THE ADDRESS MENTIONED IN FORM NO. 36 VIDE COLMUN NO. 10. MANISH JAIN, 12/40, RAJ NAGAR GHAZIABAD PAN ALOPK3379F VS. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY: NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SHRI S.S. RANA, CIT,DR DATE OF HEARING 13/03/2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 13/03/2018 2 3. ON 13.3.2018, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE NOR ITS AUTHORI SED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDED THE HEARING AND ALSO NOT FILED AN Y ADJOURNMENT . IT IS THUS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS N OT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF APPEALS. 4. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN VIEW THE PROV ISIONS OF ORDER V RULE 19A OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULE S, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 480 ( MP), WE DISMISS THESE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING O F THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL B E RECALLED. 5. IN THE RESULT APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DIS MISSED IN LIMINE. THIS DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN CO URT ON 13 TH MARCH, 2018. SD/- SD/- (PRASHANT MAHARISHI) (AMIT SHUKLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 13/03/2018 VEENA COPY FORWARDED TO 1. APPLICANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI