BANK OF INDIA, NAGPUR V. DEPUTY COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

ITA 357/NAG/2022

AI Insights

The case involves fifteen appeals by the Bank of India against orders passed by the CIT(A) in the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, concerning the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15. The primary issues were the confirmation of orders under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which treated the bank as defaulting in non-deduction of tax at source under section 194A on interest paid/credited to customers. The CIT(A) had dismissed the appeals as time-barred, which the Tribunal later condoned. The Tribunal also addressed the issue of whether the orders under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) were time-barred, concluding they were not, based on amendments to section 201(3) by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2014. The Tribunal directed a re-examination of the cases to determine the liability of the bank to deduct tax at source.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 301412 (ITAT-NAGPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 10 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 27-08-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: PartlyAllowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 23-08-2023
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 19-10-2022
• Other Referred Cases: ITA No.277/Nag/2022
• Laws Referred To: Income-tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Reasonable cause; Condonation of delay; TDS
• Section: 194A

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NAGPUR BENCH (At e- Court, Pune) BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Sl. No. ITA No. Name of the Applicant Name of Respondent Asst. Year 1 344/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Katol Branch Nagpur Zonal Office, 3 rd Floor, CSD Dept., Kingsways, Nagpur – 440 001 Maharashtra PAN : AAACB0472C DCIT (TDS), Circle-51(1),Nagpur 2013-14 2 345/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Katol Branch -do- 2014-15 3 346/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Fetri Branch -do- 2013-14 4 347/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Fetri Branch -do- 2014-15 5 348/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Sitabuldi Branch -do- 2013-14 6 349/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Sitabuldi Branch -do- 2014-15 7 350/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Besa Branch -do- 2013-14 8 351/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Besa Branch -do- 2014-15 9 352/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Midcorporate Branch -do- 2013-14 10 353/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Hingna Branch -do- 2014-15 11 354/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Ajnisquare Branch -do- 2014-15 12 355/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Bongargaon Branch -do- 2014-15 13 356/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Reshimbagh Branch -do- 2014-15 14 357/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Umred Branch -do- 2014-15 15 358/Nag/2022 Bank of India, Medical College Branch -do- 2014-15 Assessee by : Shri Pratik Sadrani & Shri Hardik Chordia Revenue by : Shri Sanjay Agrawal स ु नवाई क तार ख / Date of Hearing : 24.08.2023 घोषणा क तार ख / Date of Pronouncement : 28.08.2023 2 Bank of India Group आदेश / ORDER PER Bench: These fifteen appeals arise out of the different orders passed by the CIT(A) in National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) in relation to the assessment years 2013-14 & 2014-15. Since common issues are raised in these appeals, we are, therefore, proceeding to dispose them off by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. 2. The foremost issue raised in these appeals is against the confirmation of the orders passed by the AOs u/s.201(1)/201(1A) of the Act treating the assessee in default for non-deduction of tax at source u/s 194A on interest paid/credited to its customers and also non- condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeals before him. 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case in the captioned appeals are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A mandates that tax has to be deducted at source in respect of interest paid/credited to the account of the customers. A spot verification in some branches of the assessee bank was conducted in March, 2016 and default in compliance was found anent to the TDS 3 Bank of India Group provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more than the relevant basic exemption limits but no deduction of tax at source was made on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. After considering the reply and getting partially satisfied, the AO held the assessee to be in default u/s.201. No succor was provided by the ld. CIT(A) on merits, who also dismissed the appeals filed before him as time barred. 4. Both the sides are in agreement that the issues raised in these appeals are mutatis mutandis similar to the one extensively argued in the case of the assessee in ITA No.277/Nag/2022. Resultantly, it was pleaded that the decision arrived at by the Tribunal in such lead case will stand good for the extant batch of appeals under consideration. 5. We have heard the rival submissions and gone through the relevant material on record. The Pune Tribunal in the above referred case has held that there was a reasonable cause in presenting the appeal belatedly before the ld. CIT(A), thereby condoning the delay in filing 4 Bank of India Group of the appeal. Following the view, we condone the delay in presenting the appeals before the ld. CIT(A). 6. The next issue assailed in the instant batch is about the limitation. Taking cognizance of the amendment carried out to the provisions of section 201(3) by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2014 substituting the sub- section (3) w.e.f. 01-10-2014, we have held in our above referred order that the order u/s.201(1)/201(1A) was not time barred. Following the view taken therein, the ground raised by the assessee on this score is not allowed. 7. Next issue which survives on merits is about the liability of the assessee to deduct tax at source. We have discussed the issue lock stock and barrel in ITA No.277/Nag/2022, drawing the following conclusions: i. The question whether the assessee is in default in terms of section 201(1) needs to be determined in the light of Explanation to section 191. Howbeit, the cases covered u/s 197A(1A) [i.e. the eligible person furnishing declaration in form No. 15G that his tax liability on total income, including the interest, will be Nil] but not hit by section 197A(1B) [i.e. interest income other than interest on securities as referred to in section 194A does not exceed the basic exemption limit], will at the outset be excluded from consideration as not entailing any obligation to deduct tax at source. Similarly, the cases covered u/s 194A(1C) [i.e. persons exceeding the specified 5 Bank of India Group age furnishing form No. 15H to the effect that tax on their total income including such interest will be Nil] will also be excluded. ii. Interest u/s 201(1A) is payable by the assessee - even w.r.t. the cases where it is not in default in terms of Explanation to section 191 - from the date when the tax was deductible up to the date of filing of return by the payee including the interest income in his total income. However, the cases in which there is no obligation to deduct tax at source will not be considered for interest u/s 201(1A) of the Act. 8. In the ultimate conclusion, we set aside the impugned orders and send the matter back to the respective AOs for passing fresh orders u/s 201(1)/(1A) in the light of above directions. In case it is found that the recipients included the amount of interest in their total income, then the assessee should not be treated in default in terms of section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings. 9. In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in above terms. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 28 th August, 2023. Sd/- Sd/- (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT प ु णे / Pune; दनांक / Dated : 28 th August, 2023 Satish 6 Bank of India Group आदेश क त ल प अ े षत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant. 2. यथ / The Respondent. 3. The Pr.CIT concerned. 4. वभागीय !त!न"ध, आयकर अपील य अ"धकरण, “नागप ु र” ब & च, / DR, ITAT, “Nagpur” Bench 5. गाड) फ़ाइल / Guard File. // True Copy // आदेशान ु सार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपील य अ"धकरण, प ु णे / ITAT, Pune * Date 1. Draft dictated on 23-08-2023 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 28-08-2023 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before the second member JM 4. Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. JM 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order.