VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S,B JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SING H YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA. NO. 36/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2014-15 SHRI RAJ KUMAR NOWAL A-38, SUBHASH NAGAR SHOPPING CENTRE, SHASTRI NAGAR, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCILE-3, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AAIPN 6069 M VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI GULSHAN AGARWAL (C.A.) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. ROONI PAL (ACIT) A LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 14/10/2020 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 14/10/2020 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE PRESENT APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-IV, JAIPUR DATED 03.11.2017 FOR THE ASSESSME NT YEAR 2014-15. 2. THE LD A/R HAS STATED AT THE BAR THAT THE ASSES SEE HAS FILED A PETITION UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME-2020 TO SE TTLE THE AFORESAID MATTER AND THE SAID PETITION HAS RECENTLY BEEN ACCE PTED AND FORM 3 HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY. IT WAS ACCO RDINGLY REQUESTED THAT THE ASSESSEE MAY BE ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW THE PR ESENT APPEAL.