Appeal details
Counselvise Citation
[2024] 101 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9144 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Duration Of Justice
8 month(s) 6 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date
16-01-2024
Appeal Filed By
Assessee
Order Result
Allowed
Bench Allotted
B
Next Hearing Date
07-01-2024
Assessment Year
misc
Appeal Filed On
10-05-2023
Judgement Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER I .T .A . N o s . 3 61 & 3 6 2 / Ah d/2 0 2 3 ( A s s e s s me nt Y ea r : N. A .) Sh r e e V ar i ya Pr a ja pa t i Sa m a j Yu va Mi tr a M an d a l Me hs an a , Pa n ch va ti S oc ie t y, TB R oa d, Me h s a na - 3 84 00 2 Vs .C o m mi s s i on e r of I n co me Ta x ( Ex e mp t io n) , A h m e da ba d [ P AN N o. A B B T S8 7 54 K ] (Appellant) . . (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri H.V. Doshi, A.R. Respondent by: Shri Sudhendu Das, CIT D.R. D at e of H ea r i ng 08.01.2024 D at e of P r o no u n ce me nt 17.01.2024 O R D E R PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JM: These appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), (in short “Ld. CIT(E)”), Ahmedabad in DIN & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2022-23/1050807086(1) & 1050815871(1) vide order dated 15.03.2023. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- ITA No. 361/Ahd/2023 “1. On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) has erred in rejecting application for registration u/s 12AB of the Act. 2. On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) has not ITA Nos. 361&362/Ahd/2023 Shree Variya Prajapati Samaj Yuva Mitra Mandal Mehsana vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year –N.A. - 2 - provided reasonable opportunity of being heard as provided under Second Proviso to Section 12AB (1)(b)(ii)(B) of the Act. 3. On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) has hurriedly rejected the claim of assessee by giving reason of applicability of section 13(1)(b) and not even given opportunity by giving show cause notice by pointing out probable reason of the rejection of 12AB application. 4. Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of hearing of the appeal.” ITA No. 362/Ahd/2023 “1. On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) has erred in rejecting application for registration u/s 80G(5) of the Act. 2. On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) has erred in rejecting application for registration u/s 80G(5) without considering the fact that the registration u/s. 12A of the Act has already been provisionally approved by the authority vide order dated 31.12.2021. 3. On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) has not provided reasonable opportunity of being heard as provided under Second Proviso to Section 80G(ii)(b)(B) of the Act. 4. On the facts and in circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) has hurriedly rejected the claim of assessee by giving reason that trust is not registered u/s. 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the act without considering the facts that order for rejecting of application u/s 12AB is appealable before ITAT. 5. Appellant craves leave to add, alter or delete any ground(s) either before or in the course of hearing of the appeal.” 3. These are appeals filed by the assessee against the order passed by CIT (Exemptions) on account of rejection of grant of application under Section 12AA/80G of the Act. ITA Nos. 361&362/Ahd/2023 Shree Variya Prajapati Samaj Yuva Mitra Mandal Mehsana vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year –N.A. - 3 - 4. Before us, the counsel for the assessee submitted that firstly, in the instant case notably, the CIT(Exemptions) did not grant adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The counsel for the assessee submitted that the CIT(Exemptions) issued only two notices of hearing dated 08.12.2022 and 29.12.2022, both within a period of one month only, and rejected the application filed by the assessee, without giving adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Further, the counsel for the assessee drew our attention to page 6 of the order passed by CIT(Exemptions) and submitted that the reason for rejection of application by CIT(Exemptions) was that the assessee’s activities were restricted for benefit to a particular community only, and accordingly, in view of the provisions of Section 13(1)(d) of the Act, the assessee was not eligible for grant of deduction under Section 12AA/ 80G of the Act. It was submitted that the CIT(Exemptions) has rejected the application of the assessee on an incorrect assumption of facts, and accordingly, it was prayed that the matter may be restored to the file of CIT(Exemptions) for fresh examination, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the assessee to present it’s case on merits. 5. On going to the facts of the assessee’s case and the basis of order passed by CIT(Exemptions), we are of the considered view that in the interest of justice, the matter may be restored to the file of CIT(Exemptions) for de novo hearing after giving due opportunity of assessee to present its case on merits. In the event of failure on part of the assessee to cause appearance before CIT(Exemptions), promptly and ITA Nos. 361&362/Ahd/2023 Shree Variya Prajapati Samaj Yuva Mitra Mandal Mehsana vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year –N.A. - 4 - diligently, CIT(Exemptions) would be at liberty to pass order on the basis of material available on record, in accordance with law. 6. In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. This Order pronounced in Open Court on 17/01/2024 Sd/- Sd/- (WASEEM AHMED) (SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad; Dated 17/01/2024 TANMAY, Sr. PS TRUE COPY आदेश क त ल प अ े षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant 2. यथ / The Respondent. 3. संबं धत आयकर आय ु त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आय ु त(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 5. वभागीय त न ध, आयकर अपील!य अ धकरण, अहमदाबाद / DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. गाड' फाईल / Guard file. आदेशान ु सार/ BY ORDER, उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.Registrar) आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, अहमदाबाद / ITAT, Ahmedabad 1. Date of dictation 15.01.2024 (Dictated by Hon’ble Member on his Dragon Software) 2. Date on which the typed draft is placed before the Dictating Member 15.01.2024 3. Other Member..................... 4. Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr.P.S./P.S 16.01.2024 5. Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for pronouncement .01.2024 6. Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr.P.S./P.S 17.01.2024 7. Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk 17.01.2024 8. Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk.......................................... 9. The date on which the file goes to the Assistant Registrar for signature on the order.......................... 10. Date of Despatch of the Order..........................................
