Kerala Gramin Bank, Puthanathani Branch, Puthanathani V. ITO, Ward TDS, Kozhikode, Kozhikode

ITA 362/COCH/2022

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 106 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1335 (ITAT-COCHIN)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 29-06-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 29-03-2022
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: TDS
• Section: 154; 234E; 200A

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN Before Shri George George K, JM & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, AM ITA No. 370/COCH/2022 Kattimoola Branch 2015-2016 Q2 ITA No.197/COCH/2022 Hosangadi Branch 2013-2014 Q4 ITA No.180/COCH/2022 Panamaram Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No.181/COCH/2022 Panamaram Branch 2013-2014 Q3 ITA No. 182/COCH/2022 Panamaram Branch 2013-2014 Q3 ITA No. 371/COCH/2022 Koothattukulam 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 329/COCH/2022 Mundakkayam Branch 2015-2016 Q4 ITA No. 187/COCH/2022 Mannar Branch 2013-2014 Q3 ITA No. 195/COCH/2022 Cherthala Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 204/COCH/2022 Thiruvandoor Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 299/COCH/2022 Kottiyam Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 396/COCH/2022 Manimala Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 539/COCH/2022 Kidangoor Branch 2015-2016 Q2 ITA No. 230/COCH/2022 Peruvayal Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 231/COCH/2022 Peruvayal Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 214/COCH/2022 Kaniyambetta Branch 2013-2014 Q4 ITA No. 215/COCH/2022 Kaniyambetta Branch 2014-2015 Q2 ITA No. 221/COCH/2022 Azhinhilam Branch 2013-2014 Q4 ITA No. 222/COCH/2022 Azhinhilam Branch 2015-2016 Q1 ITA No. 390/COCH/2022 Karulai Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 391/COCH/2022 Karulai Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 209/COCH/2022 Kakkur Branch 2014-2015 Q3 ITA No. 301/COCH/2022 Karuvatoor Branch 2013-2014 Q3 ITA No. 403/COCH/2022 Thavanur Branch 2013-2014 Q4 ITA No. 362/COCH/2022 Puthanathani Branch 2013-2014 Q4 ITA No. 363/COCH/2022 Puthanathani Branch 2013-2014 Q4 ITA No. 238/COCH/2022 Thirurkad Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 239/COCH/2022 Thirurkad Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 240/COCH/2022 Thirurkad Branch 2013-2014 Q3 ITA No. 400/COCH/2022 Chelari Branch 2013-2014 Q4 ITA No. 290/COCH/2022 Vaduvanchal Branch 2014-2015 Q2 ITA No. 292/COCH/2022 Vaduvanchal Branch 2013-2014 Q3 ITA No. 471/COCH/2022 Vaduvanchal Branch 2013-2014 Q4 ITA No. 314/COCH/2022 Vatakara Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 315/COCH/2022 Vatakara Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 344/COCH/2022 Mannarkkad Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 345/COCH/2022 Mannarkkad Branch 2013-2014 Q3 ITA No. 364/COCH/2022 Pattambi Branch 2014-2015 Q2 ITA No. 280/COCH/2022 Periya Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 281/COCH/2022 Periya Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 282/COCH/2022 Periya Branch 2013-2014 Q3 ITA No. 283/COCH/2022 Periya Branch 2013-2014 Q4 ITA No. 401/COCH/2022 Vellamunda Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 420/COCH/2022 Payyavoor Branch 2013-2014 Q3 ITA No.370/Coch/2022 & Ors. M/s.Kerala Gramin Bank, Kattimoola Branch & Ors. 2 M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank FM Wing, KGB Head Office AK Road, Malappuram 676505 PAN: AACAK 1498D v. The Income Tax Officer (TDS) Trivandrum/Kollam/Kottayam, Alappuzha/Kochi/Trissur, Kozhikode/Palakkad/Kannur (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sri.Hardik Chordia & Sri.Pratik Sadrani, CAs Respondent by : Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 20.06.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 30.06.2022 O R D E R Per Bench : These are group of 46 appeals at the instance of the assessee. The appeals are directed against separate orders of the CIT(A), all dated 28.05.2021. The relevant assessment years are 2013-2014 to 2015-2016. Common issues are raised in the appeals, hence, there were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 2. The Registry had noted delay in filing these appeals (delay of around 120 days). The orders of the CIT(A) are all dated 28.05.2021 and appeals before ITAT has been filed in the month of January and February 2022. The Hon’ble Apex Court (in Miscellaneous Application No.21 of 2022 dated 10.01.2022), due to the pandemic situation had excluded the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 in computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal, application or proceedings. ITA No. 251/COCH/2022 Thayyil Branch 2013-2014 Q2 ITA No. 252/COCH/2022 Thayyil Branch 2013-2014 Q3 ITA No.370/Coch/2022 & Ors. M/s.Kerala Gramin Bank, Kattimoola Branch & Ors. 3 Further, as per judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court, notwithstanding the actual balance period of limitation, all persons shall have a limitation period of 90 days from 01.03.2022. Further, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that in the event the actual balance period of limitation remaining, with effect from 01.03.2022 is greater than 90 days, that larger period shall apply. In these cases, the appeals have been filed before ITAT between January 2022 and March 2022 (i.e. well within the period of limitation contemplated by the Hon’ble Apex Court). Therefore, in view of the above judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court, there is no delay in filing these appeals and we proceed to dispose of the same on merits. 3. The solitary issue raised in all these appeals is whether the CIT(A) has erred in confirming the Assessing Officer’s order u/s 200A of the I.T.Act, wherein he levied late fees u/s 234E of the I.T.Act for various quarters. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The assessee is Regional Rural Bank, having its branches in different parts in Kerala, formed with an object of serving rural people, in particular their banking needs. For the assessment years under consideration the assessee’s branches filed TDS returns in Form No.26Q and Form No.24Q for various quarters belatedly. The Assessing Officer levied fees and interest u/s 234E r.w.s. 200A of the I.T.Act for late filing of Form 26Q and 24Q of the said quarters. ITA No.370/Coch/2022 & Ors. M/s.Kerala Gramin Bank, Kattimoola Branch & Ors. 4 5. Aggrieved by the orders of the Assessing Officer, the assessees filed appeals before the first appellate authority. However, the CIT(A) confirmed the A.O.’s orders for levying fees u/s 234E of the I.T.Act. The CIT(A) relied on the judgment of the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Sree Narayana Guru Smaraka Sangam Upper Primary School v. Union of India and Others reported in (2017) 392 ITR 457 (Ker.) and the judgment of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Shri Rajesh Kourani v. Union of India reported in (2017) 83 taxmann.com 137 (Gujarat). Further, the CIT(A) noted that to file appeal u/s 154 of the I.T.Act, there is no mistake apparent from record. 6. Aggrieved by the orders of the CIT(A), the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. The learned AR submitted that the issue raised is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the following judicial pronouncements:- (i) The judgment of the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Olari Little Flower Kuries (P.) Ltd. v. UOI reported in (2022) 440 ITR 26 (Ker.) (ii) The Hon’ble Kerala High Court judgment in the case of M/s.Sarala Memorial Hospital v. Union of India & The Income Tax Officer (TDS) [WP(C) No.37775 of 2018 of 18 th December, 2018] (iii) The judgment of the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Sanjeev Mathew & Co. v. ITO (TDS) (judgment dated 30.11.2021) (iv) The judgment of the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Headmaster, Government Upper Primary School v. ITO (TDS) (judgment dated 18.05.2022) ITA No.370/Coch/2022 & Ors. M/s.Kerala Gramin Bank, Kattimoola Branch & Ors. 5 (v) The order of the Cochin Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Travels Trails India Pvt. Ltd. V. ACIT TDS, Trivandrum, [ITA No168/Coch/2020 dated 10 th June, 2020] (vi) The order of the Cochin Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Sri.Sabir Ali v. ACIT in ITA No.200/Coch/2021 & Ors (order dated 20.05.2022) 7. Apart from the above submission, as regards the contention of the CIT(A) that there is no mistake apparent from record, the learned AR contended that non-consideration of decision of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in itself is a mistake apparent from record as held by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of ACIT v. Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Ltd. Reported in (2008) 305 ITR 227 (SC). 8. The learned Departmental Representative relied on the orders of the CIT(A). 9. We have heard rival submissions and perused the material on record. The assessee-branches have filed belatedly TDS returns for various quarters. The details of branch of the assessee, TAN No. of branch, financial year, the quarters, date of filing of TDS returns, due date of filing of original TDS, late fee levied u/s 234E of the I.T.Act, Intimation dates, date of CIT(A)’s orders etc., are enclosed as Annexure-A to this order. 9.1 The Assessing Officer cannot make any adjustment other than one prescribed in section 200A of the Act. Prior to 01.06.2015, there was no enabling provision in section 200A of ITA No.370/Coch/2022 & Ors. M/s.Kerala Gramin Bank, Kattimoola Branch & Ors. 6 the Act for making adjustment in respect of statement filed by the assessee with regard to tax deducted at source by levying fees u/s 234E of the Act. The Parliament for the first time enabled the Assessing Officer to make adjustment by levying fees u/s 234E of the Act with effect from 01.06.2015. The Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Olari Little Flower Kuries (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India reported in (2022) 440 ITR 26 (Ker.), has held that since provision of section 200A of the I.T.Act was amended to enable computation of fee payable u/s 234E of the I.T.Act at the time of processing of return and said amendment came into effect from 01.06.2015 (in view of CBDT Circular No.19 of 2015 dated 17.11.2015) intimations issued u/s 200A of the I.T.Act dealing with fee for belated filing of TDS returns for the period prior to 01.06.2015 were invalid and were to be set aside. Therefore, going by the dictum laid down by the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court judgment in the case of Olari Little Flower Kuries (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India (supra), the levy of late fee for the various quarters for financial years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 cannot be sustained in order passed u/s 200A of the I.T.Act, prior to 01.06.2015. 9.2 The CIT(A) had relied on the judgment of the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Sree Narayana Guru Smaraka Sangam Upper Primary School v. Union of India and Others (supra). The judgment of the Hon’ble High Court was primarily concerned with the constitutional validity of section 234E of the I.T.Act. The Hon’ble Kerala Court was not adjudicating the issue whether the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act ITA No.370/Coch/2022 & Ors. M/s.Kerala Gramin Bank, Kattimoola Branch & Ors. 7 with effect from 01.06.2015 has retrospective effect or not. As mentioned earlier, the amendment to section 200A of the I.T.Act whether it applicable from 01.06.2015 has been decided in favour of the assessee by the judgment of the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Olari Little Flower Kuries (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India (supra). 9.3 As regards the CIT(A) placing reliance on the judgment of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Rajesh Kourani v. Union of India (supra), we notice that the Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of M/s.Sarala Memorial Hospital v. Union of India (supra) has distinguished the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court judgment. The Hon’ble Kerala High Court had disposed of the Writ Petition in favour of the assessee, stating that there is cleavage in judicial opinion and the judgment in the case of Shri Rajesh Kourani v. Union of India (supra) has not considered CBDT Circular No.19 of 2015, which has clearly emphasized that the amendment would take effect only from 01.06.2016. Therefore, it was concluded by the Hon’ble Kerala High Court that the amendment relating to section 200A of the I.T.Act is prospective with effect from 01.06.2016. In view of the aforesaid reasoning and the judgments of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court, cited supra, we allow the claim of the assessee. It is ordered accordingly. 9.4 Before concluding, it is to be mentioned that the CIT(A) held that there is no mistake apparent from record, hence, the appeals filed by the assessee as against orders passed u/s 154 of the I.T.Act cannot be entertained. The judgment of the ITA No.370/Coch/2022 & Ors. M/s.Kerala Gramin Bank, Kattimoola Branch & Ors. 8 Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of M/s.Sarala Memorial Hospital v. Union of India & The Income Tax Officer (TDS) (supra) was rendered on 18.12.2018. The intimation u/s 200A of the I.T.Act and the orders of the CIT(A) were passed much subsequent to 18.12.2018. Non-consideration of judgment of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in itself is a mistake apparent from record as held by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of ACIT v. Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Ltd. (supra). Therefore, we hold that the CIT(A) was not legally correct in dismissing the appeals stating that there is no mistake apparent from record. It is ordered accordingly. 10. In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed. Order pronounced on this 30 th day of June, 2022. Sd/- (Laxmi Prasad Sahu) Sd/- (George George K) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Kochi; Dated : 30 th June, 2022. Devadas G* Copy to : 1. The Appellant. 2. The Respondent. 3. The CIT(A)-. 4. The CIT, Cochin. 5. The DR, ITAT, Cochin. 6. Guard File. Asst.Registrar/ITAT, Cochin ITA No.370/Coch/2022 & Ors. M/s.Kerala Gramin Bank, Kattimoola Branch & Ors. 9 Annexure – A Sr No Name of Branch of Kerala Gramin Bank TAN of Branch FY Qtr Form Type Actual Date of Filing of Original TDS Return 286 Kattimoola Branch CHNN00358B 2014-15 Q2 24Q 10-Nov-14 287 Hosangadi Branch CHNN00663F 2012-13 Q4 26Q 10-Jun-13 288 Panamaram Branch CHNN00619D 2012-13 Q2 26Q 22-Nov-12 289 Panamaram Branch CHNN00619D 2012-13 Q3 24Q 1-Feb-13 290 Panamaram Branch CHNN00619D 2012-13 Q3 26Q 7-Feb-13 291 Koothattukulam Branch CHNN00814C 2012-13 Q2 26Q 29-Nov-12 292 Mundakkayam Branch TVDN00240C 2012-13 Q4 24Q 5-Jun-13 293 Mannar Branch TVDN00355F 2012-13 Q3 24Q 1-Feb-13 294 Cherthala Branch TVDN00354E 2012-13 Q2 26Q 29-Nov-12 295 Thiruvanvandoor Branch TVDN00378A 2012-13 Q2 26Q 29-Nov-12 296 Kottiyam Branch TVDN00629G 2012-13 Q2 26Q 29-Nov-12 297 Manimala Branch TVDN00678G 2012-13 Q2 26Q 29-Nov-12 298 Kidangoor Branch TVDN00709C 2012-13 Q2 24Q 1-Nov-12 299 Peruvayal Branch CHNS02243D 2012-13 Q2 24Q 28-Nov-12 300 Peruvayal Branch CHNS02243D 2012-13 Q2 26Q 28-Nov-12 301 Kaniyambetta Branch CHNS02544D 2012-13 Q4 24Q 24-Jul-13 302 Kaniyambetta Branch CHNS02544D 2013-14 Q2 26Q 12-Nov-13 303 Azhinhilam Branch CHNS00121C 2012-13 Q4 26Q 17-Jun-13 304 Azhinhilam Branch CHNS00121C 2014-15 Q1 26Q 14-Oct-14 305 Karulai Branch CHNS02557C 2012-13 Q2 24Q 27-Nov-12 306 Karulai Branch CHNS02557C 2012-13 Q2 26Q 27-Nov-12 307 Kakkur Branch CHNS02233A 2013-14 Q3 26Q 14-May-14 308 Kuruvattur Branch CHNS00149C 2012-13 Q3 26Q 10-Jun-13 309 Thavanur Branch CHNS02569A 2012-13 Q4 26Q 3-Jun-13 310 Puthanathani Branch CHNS00201F 2012-13 Q4 24Q 10-Jun-13 311 Puthanathani Branch CHNS00201F 2012-13 Q4 26Q 10-Jun-13 312 Thirurkkad Branch CHNS00701B 2012-13 Q2 24Q 1-Jan-13 313 Thirurkkad Branch CHNS00701B 2012-13 Q2 26Q 1-Jan-13 314 Thirurkkad Branch CHNS00701B 2012-13 Q3 26Q 31-Jan-13 315 Chelari Branch CHNS00128C 2012-13 Q4 24Q 18-Jun-13 316 Vaduvanchal Branch CHNV00607F 2012-13 Q2 26Q 4-Jan-13 317 Vaduvanchal Branch CHNV00607F 2012-13 Q3 24Q 26-Apr-13 318 Vaduvanchal Branch CHNV00607F 2012-13 Q4 26Q 7-Jun-13 319 Vadakara Branch CHNS02522C 2012-13 Q2 24Q 26-Nov-12 320 Vadakara Branch CHNS02522C 2012-13 Q2 26Q 26-Nov-12 ITA No.370/Coch/2022 & Ors. M/s.Kerala Gramin Bank, Kattimoola Branch & Ors. 10 321 Mannarkkad Branch CHNS02115B 2012-13 Q2 24Q 1-Jan-13 322 Mannarkkad Branch CHNS02115B 2012-13 Q3 24Q 14-Feb-13 323 Pattambi Branch CHNS02549B 2012-13 Q2 24Q 1-Jan-13 324 Periya Branch CHNN00882A 2012-13 Q2 24Q 22-Nov-12 325 Periya Branch CHNN00882A 2012-13 Q2 26Q 22-Nov-12 326 Periya Branch CHNN00882A 2012-13 Q3 26Q 18-Mar-13 327 Periya Branch CHNN00882A 2012-13 Q4 24Q 31-May-13 328 Vellamunda Branch CHNN00371A 2012-13 Q2 26Q 22-Nov-12 329 Payyavoor Branch CHNN00376F 2012-13 Q3 26Q 13-Feb-13 330 Thayyil Branch CHNN00367D 2012-13 Q2 27Q 2-Jan-13 331 Thayyil Branch CHNN00367D 2012-13 Q3 26Q 26-Feb-13