1 ITA NO. 3624/DEL/2014 IN THE INCOME TAX APPE LLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: E NEW DELHI BEFORE MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL ME MBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCO UNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 3624/DEL/20 14 (A.Y 2007-08) (THROUGH VIDEO CON FERENCING) MADHU BHATNAGAR PLOT NO. 16, FLAT NO. 553, SECTOR- 22, BANK VIHAR, DWARKA NEW DELHI AIJPB3155G (APPELLANT) VS ITO WARD-27(3) NEW DELHI (RESPONDENT) ORDER PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST ORDER DATED 07/03/2014 PASSED BY CIT(A)-XXIV, NEW DELHI FOR ASSESSMENT YE AR 2007-08. 2. BEFORE US, THE LD. AR SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESS EE HAS MOVED AN APPLICATION TO RESOLVE THE PENDING ISSUE THROUGH DI RECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME (VSV) ACT, 2020, AND HAS FILED DECLARATION FORM NO. 1 & 2 AND RECEIVED FORM NO. 3 DATED 31.03.2021 APPELLANT BY SH. ABHISHEK MATHUR, CA RESPONDENT BY MS. PRAMITA M. BISWAS, CIT DR DATE OF HEARING 29.07.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 29.07.2021 2 ITA NO. 3624/DEL/2014 3. IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID FACTS AND AFTER CONSIDE RING THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE ASSESSEE, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT THAT IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARR EARS FOR THE CAPTIONED ASSESSMENT YEAR IS NOT ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE AFORESAID ACT, THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUN AL FOR REINSTITUTION OF THE APPEAL AND THE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER THE SAME. TH E APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT IN BOTH THE PART IES ON THIS 29 TH DAY OF JULY, 2021. SD/- SD/- (PRASHANT MAHARISHI) (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEM BER DATED: 29/07/2021 R. NAHEED * COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI 3 ITA NO. 3624/DEL/2014