Mr. Praveen Saxena, New Delhi V. JCIT, New Delhi

ITA 3674/DEL/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 53220 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 3 month(s) 19 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-11-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Next Hearing Date: 19-08-2014
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 02-08-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: PRATIMA KAUSHIK

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.P. TOLANI AND SHRI B.K. HALDAR ITA NO. 3674/DEL/2010 ASSTT. YR: 2007-08 MR. PRAVEEN SAXENA, VS. JCIT, RANGE-32, 301, SOUTH EX. PLAZA-II, NEW DELHI. SOUTH EXTN. PART-2, NEW DELHI. PAN/GIR NO. AAPPS0648P (APPELLANT ) ( RESPONDENT ) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MS. PRATIMA KAUSHIK SR. DR O R D E R PER R.P. TOLANI, J.M : THIS IS ASSESSEES APPEAL AGAINST CIT(A)S ORDER DATED 30-6-2010 RELATING TO A.Y. 2007-08.. 2. NONE PUT IN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE HEARING FIXED FOR 21-11- 2011 DESPITE PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE DATE OF HEAR ING AS IS APPARENT FROM ORDER SHEET DATED 7-9-2011 WHEN THE HEARING WAS ADJOURNED TO 21 -11-2011 AND BOTH THE PARTIES WERE INTIMATED OF THE DATE FIXED IN OPEN COURT. EVEN NO REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT OF HEARING HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE ASSESSEE. IT GIVES AN IMPRE SSION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING ITS APPEAL. WE, THEREFORE, HAVE NO OPTI ON BUT TO DISMISS THE APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE, PLACING RELIANCE ON THE RATIO OF D ECISIONS IN THE FOLLOWING CASES: CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL .); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR 223 ITR 480 (MP). 3. ASSESSEES APPEAL STANDS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 21-11-2011. SD/- SD/- ( B.K. HALDAR ) ( R.P. TOLANI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 21-11-2011. MP COPY TO : 1. ASSESSEE 2. AO 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR