M/s Dogra Drug Pharma, Bilaspur V. Addl. CIT, Mandi

ITA 368/CHANDI/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2014] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 73452 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH)
• Duration Of Justice: 9 month(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 29-01-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 17-08-2015
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 04-04-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH A, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI T.R. SOOD, A.M AND MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM ITA NO. 367, 368/CHD/2013 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07 & 2007-08 DOGRA DRUG PHARMA VS. ADDL CIT, MANDI RANGE PLOT NO. 29 MANDI INDUSTRIAL AREA BILASPUR DISTT. BILASPUR AABFD 1427 B (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY: SHRI AKHILESH GUPTA DATE OF HEARING 28.1.2014 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 29.1.2014 O R D E R PER T.R.SOOD, A.M THESE APPEALS ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.12.201229.1.2013 OF LD. CIT(A), SHIMLA. 2. THESE APPEALS WERE FIXED FOR HEARING ON 9.7.2013 AND A NOTICE THROUGH RPAD WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BUT AT THE TIME OF HEARING NOBODY APPEARED FOR THE ASSESSEE AND THE CASE WAS ADJOURNED TO 28.1.2014 BUT AT THE TIME OF HEARING N OBODY APPEARED FOR THE ASSESSEE. IT SEEMS THAT THE ASSES SEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEALS AND THE INSTANT APPEALS ARE LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED. IN THIS CASE WE ARE FORTIF IED BY THE FOLLOWING CASE LAWS: (I) CIT V. MULTI PLAN INDIA LTD, 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) (II) ESTATE OF LATE TUKAJIRAO HOLKAR V. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP) 2 (III) CIT V. B.N. BHATTACHARJEE & ANOTHER, 18 ITR 461. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE CITED CASE LAWS WE DISMISS THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE FOR NON PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMI SSED IN LIMINE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 29.1.2014 SD/- SD/- (SUSHMA CHOWLA) (T.R. SOOD) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED : 29.1.2014 SURESH COPY TO: THE APPELLANT/THE RESPONDENT/THE CIT/THE C IT(A)/THE DR