Appeal details
Counselvise Citation
36923314 RSA 2014
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Duration Of Justice
4 month(s) 3 day(s)
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Income Tax Appeal
Pronouncement Date
10-10-2014
Appeal Filed By
Assessee
Order Result
Dismissed
Bench Allotted
DB
Next Hearing Date
10-10-2014
Assessment Year
2010-2011
Appeal Filed On
06-06-2014
Judgement Text
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELALTE TRIBUNAL : JODHPUR BENCH : JODHPUR BEFORE SHRI HARI OM MARATHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI N.K. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER. ITA NO. 369 /JODH/2014 (A.Y. 20 1 0 - 11 ) SMT. MANJU DEVI BAGWAN, PROP. M/S. GAYATRI MARBLE, JAWAHAR NAGAR, AMET, RAJSAMAND. VS. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1, UDAIPUR. PAN NO. AEJPB 3642 J (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ITA NO. 370/JODH/2014 (A.Y. 200 6 - 07 ) SHRI BHARAT KUMAR BAGWAN, PROP. M/S. RAMESHWARAM MARBLE, JAWAHAR NAGAR, AMET, RAJSAMAND. VS. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1, UDAIPUR. PAN NO. ACYPB 0508 J (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ITA NO. 371/JODH/2014 (A.Y. 200 6 - 07 ) SMT. NARBADA DEVI BAGWAN, PROP. M/S. SHIV KAILASH MARBLE SUPPLIERS , JAWAHAR NAGAR, AMET, RAJSAMAND. VS. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1, UDAIPUR. PAN NO. ABOPB 1598 B (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) 2 ASSESSEE BY : SHRI MUKESH SONI. DEPARTMENT BY : SHRI MAHESH KUMAR - D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 1 0 / 1 0 /201 4 . DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 10 / 1 0/201 4 . O R D E R PER N.K. SAINI, A.M TH E S E THREE APPEAL S BY THE DIFFERENT ASSESSEES ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER S OF THE L D . CIT(A) (C) , JAIPUR AS PER THE FOLLOWING DETAILS: - S.NO. NAME OF THE PARTY APPEAL NO. DATE OF ORDER A.Y. 1 SMT. MANJU DEVI BAGWAN ITA NO . 369/JODH/2014 24/03/2014 2010 - 11 2 SHRI BHARAT KUMAR BAGWAN ITA NO. 370/JODH/2014 03/03/2014 2006 - 07 3 SMT. NARBADA DEVI BAGWAN ITA NO. 371/JODH/2014 04/03/2014 2006 - 07 2 ALL THESE APPEALS BY THE DIFFERENT ASSESSEES ARE UNSIGNED , WITHOUT FILING OF REQUISITE FEE . EVEN THOUGH, THE ABOVE DEFECTS WERE COMMUNICATED BY OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATED 22/07/2014 , THESE ASSESSEES DID NOT REMOVE THE DEFECTS AS POINTED OUT BY THE REGISTRY . 3 MOREOVER, SEPARATE APPEALS HAVING SIMILAR GROUNDS AGAINST THE SAME ORDERS OF THE LD. CIT(A), CENTRAL, JAIPUR HAVE ALSO BEEN FILED BY THESE ASSESSEES IN I.T.A.NOS. 373 TO 375 /JODH/2014 , WHICH ARE PENDING BEFORE THIS BENCH FOR ADJUDICATION . THEREFORE, THESE APPEALS BEING DUPLICATE , WITHOUT SIGNATURES OF THE ASSES SEES AND WITHOUT DEPOSITING THE REQUISITE FEE ARE INFRUCTUOUS , SO THESE ARE DISMISSED . 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEES ARE DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS. ( ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 10 TH OCTOBER , 201 4) . SD/ - SD/ - ( HARI OM MARATHA ) (N.K.SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED : 10 TH OCTOBER , 201 4 . VR/ - COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE LD. CIT 4. THE CIT(A) 5. THE D.R SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY , ITAT, JODHPUR .
