ACIT, Bhiwani V. M/s. Sandhu Poultry Pvt. Ltd., Jind

ITA 3719/DEL/2008

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 131 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6889 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 7 year(s) 9 month(s) 3 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 20-09-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Next Hearing Date: 19-09-2016
• Assessment Year: 2001-2002
• Appeal Filed On: 17-12-2008
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Retrospective amendment; Tax effect

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : G NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. H.S. SIDHU , JUDICIAL M EMBER AND SH. O.P. KANT , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 3719 /DEL/ 2008 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2001 - 02 ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HUDA COMPLEX, BHIWANI VS. M/S. SANDHU POULTRY PVT. LTD., VPO RODH, TEHSIL SAFIDON, DISTT. JIND PAN : (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY SH. N.K. BANSAL, SR. DR RESPONDENT BY NONE DATE OF HEARING 19.09.2016 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 20.09.2016 ORDER PER O.P. KANT , A. M. : THIS APPEAL BY THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS ), ROHTAK , DATED 07.10.2008 IN RELATION TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001 - 02 . 2. NONE PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. WE HAVE HEARD LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESE NTATIVE AND PERUSED THE RELEVANT MATERIAL ON RECORD. IT IS NOTICED THAT THE CBDT HAS ISSUED CIRCULAR NO. 21 OF 2015 DATED 10.12.2015 WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT, REVISING THE MONETARY LIMIT TO RS.10,00,000/ - FOR NOT FILING APPEALS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. LEARN ED CIT(DR) COULD NOT CONTROVERT THE FACT THAT TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THE APPEAL IS LESS THAN RS.10,00,000/ - . 3. FROM PARA 10 OF THE ABOVE CIRCULAR, IT IS PALPABLE THAT THE INSTRUCTION IS APPLICABLE TO THE PENDING APPEALS ALSO WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT AND THERE IS A CLEAR - CUT DIRECTION TO THE DEPARTMENT TO WITHDRAW OR NOT PRESS SUCH APPEALS FILED BEFORE 2 ITA NO. 3719/DEL/2008 AY: 2001 - 02 THE ITAT, WHEREIN TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS.10,00,000/ - . GOING BY THE PRESCRIPTION OF THE AFORE - NOTED CIRCULAR, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE REVENUE SHOULD HAVE EITHER NOT FILED THE INSTANT APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL OR WITHDRAWN THE SAME AS THE TAX EFFECT IN THIS APPEAL IS ADMITTEDLY LESS THAN THE PRESCRIBED LIMIT I.E. RS. 10,00,000/ - FOR NOT FILING THE APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY , WE DISMISS THE INSTANT APPEAL W ITH OUT GOING INTO MERITS OF THE CASE. HOWEVER, THE DEPARTMENT IS AT LIBERTY TO FILE THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION, IF THE TAX EFFECT IS FOUND TO BE MORE THAN THE PRESCRIBED LIMITED OF RS. 10 LACS OR OTHERWISE. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE STA NDS DISMISSED. THE DECISION IS PRONOUN CED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 2 0 T H SEPT., 2016 . S D / - S D / - ( H.S. SIDHU ) ( O.P. KANT ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 2 0 T H SEPTEMBER , 2016 . RK / - COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR ASST. REGISTRAR, ITAT, NEW DELHI