IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH I-2 NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P.KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 3742/DEL/2015 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10) SPECTRIS TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD., 201-B, SECOND FLOOR, PARK CENTRA, SECTOR-30, GURGAON-122002. PAN-AAGCS6654R VS ITO, WARD-9(1), NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SH. SANJAY KUMAR YADAV, SR.DR DATE OF HEARING 20.06.2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 20.06.2018 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAIN ST THE ORDER OF LD.CIT(A)-44, NEW DELHI DATED 10.03.2015 FOR AY 200 9-10. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE NOTIFYING THE DATE OF HEARING THROUGH REGISTERED POST. IT, THEREFORE, AP PEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NO MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THE APPE AL OF ASSESSEE IS, THEREFORE, LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND HAVING REGARD TO RULE 1 9(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FOLLOWING VARIOUS DECI SIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.); HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND ALSO THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME ITA NO. 3742/DEL/2015 COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477-478) WHEREIN THEIR LORDSHIPS HELD THAT THE APPEAL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILING OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFFECTIVELY PURSUI NG THE SAME, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 20.06.2018. SD/- SD/- (O.P.KANT) (BHAVNESH SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATE:-20 TH JUNE, 2018 *AMIT KUMAR* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI