NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT, MUMBAI V. DCIT (EXEMPTION) - 2(1), MUMBAI

ITA 3871/MUM/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 116 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4705 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 2 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 02-08-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 01-06-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Charitable institution; Opportunity of being heard
• Section: 195; 12; 11

Judgement Text

T HE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA ( A M) & SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (JM) I.T.A. NO. 3871/MUM/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008 - 09) I.T.A. NO. 3872 /MUM/ 201 8 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 13 - 1 4 ) I.T.A. NO. 3873/MUM/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014 - 15) NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK M ANAGEMENT S - 14, PEMINO ALTAMOUNT ROAD MUMBAI - 400026. V S . DCIT - (EXEMPTION) - 2(1) MUMBAI. ( APPELLANT ) ( RESPONDENT ) I.T.A. NO. 423 8 /MUM/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 201 3 - 1 4 ) I.T.A. NO. 4239 /MUM/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 14 - 1 5 ) DCIT - (EXEMPTION) - 2(1) MUMBAI. V S . NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK M ANAGEMENT S - 14, PEMINO, ALTAMOUNT ROAD MUMBAI - 400026. ( APPELLANT ) ( RESPONDENT ) PAN : AAATN0040P ASSESSEE BY SHRI S. ANANTHAN & MS. LALITHA RAMESHWARAN DEPARTMENT BY SHRI SAMUEL DARSE & SHRI ASHISH KUMAR DATE OF HEARING 23 .7 . 201 9 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 2 . 8 . 201 9 O R D E R PER BENCH : - ITA NO. 3871/MUM/2018 : - THIS IS AN APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT - A FOR ASSESSMENT 2008 - 09 D ATED 27.3.2018. 2. AT THE OUTSET COUNSEL OF THE ASSESSEE PRAYED THAT ASSESSEE MAY BE PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE APEPAL . LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT 2 HAVE ANY OBJECTION IN THIS REGARD. HENCE T HIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN . I TA NO S . 387 2,3873,4239,4238/MUM2018 3. T HESE ARE CROSS APPEALS BY THE REVENUE AND ASSESSEE FOR ASSESSMENT YEARS 2013 - 14 AND 2014 - 15 RESPECTIVELY . REVENUES APPEAL S : - 4. T HE COMMON ISSUE RAISED IS RELATING TO LEARNED CIT - A HOLDING THAT ASSESSEE IS ENTITLED TO E X EMPTION UNDER SECTION 11 AND PROVISO TO SECTION 2(15) ARE NOT APPLICABLE . 5. A T THE OUTSET LEARNED COUNSEL OF THE ASSESSEE STATED THAT THIS ISSUE IS, COVERED IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE BY THE DECISION OF THE IN ASSESSEE'S OWN CASE, WHITE ORDER DATED JANUAR Y 25, 2018. 6. LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FAIRLY AGREED TO THE ABOVE PROPOSITION. 7. UPON CONSIDERATION , WE FIND THAT ITAT IN ASSESSEE'S OWN CASE AS REFERRED ABOVE HAS HELD AS UNDER : - 8. WE HAVE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS. SEC. 2(15) OF THE ACT DEFINES THE EXPRESSION 'CHARITABLE PURPOSE'. SO FAR AS IT IS RELEVANT FOR OUR PURPOSE, THE EXPRESSION 'CHARITABLE PURPOSE' SEEKS TO INCLUDE 'EDUCATION'. THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE IS THAT ITS ACTIVITIES FALL WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE EXPRESSIO N 'EDUCATION' AND, THEREFORE, IT IS COVERED WITHIN THE MEANING OF 'CHARITABLE PURPOSE' CONTAINED IN SEC. 2(15) OF THE ACT. THE STAND OF THE REVENUE IS TO THE CONTRARY AS, ACCORDING TO IT, THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE ARE MERELY TO CARRY OUT TRAINING, SEM INARS, POST - GRADUATE TRAINING AND, THAT TOO, AGAINST COLLECTION OF FEES AND, THEREFORE, CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS 'EDUCATION'. FURTHER, THE EXPRESSION 'CHARITABLE PURPOSE' ALSO INCLUDES THE ACTIVITY OF 'ADVANCEMENT OF ANY OTHER OBJECT OF GENERAL PUBLIC UTILI TY'. ACCORDING TO THE REVENUE, EVEN IF THE ACTIVITIES ARE TO BE CONSIDERED AS FALLING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF SEC. 2(15) OF THE ACT, IT FITS INTO THE SAID EXPRESSION 'ADVANCEMENT OF ANY OTHER OBJECT OF GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITY'. THE PROVISO TO SEC. 2(15) OF THE ACT WAS ADDED W.E.F. 01.04.2009, W HICH PRESCRIBES THAT THE ACTIVITY OF 'ADVANCEMENT OF ANY OTHER OBJECT OF GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITY' SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO BE FOR 'CHARITABLE PURPOSE' IF IT INVOLVES CARRYING ON OF ANY NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT 3 ACTIVITY IN THE NATURE OF TRADE, COM MERCE OR BUSINESS OR ANY ACTIVITY OF RENDERING ANY SERVICE IN RELATION TO ANY TRADE, COMMERCE OR BUSINESS FOR A CESS OR FEE OR ANY OTHER CONSIDERATION IRRESPECTIVE OF THE NATURE OF USE OR APPLICATION OR RETENTION OF THE INCOME FROM SUCH ACTIVITY. BY RELYIN G ON SUCH PROVISO, THE REVENUE CONTENDS THAT SINCE ASSESSEE IS CARRYING OUT ITS PROGRAMME OF TRAINING, ETC. AGAINST CHARGING OF FEE, THEREFORE, ITS ACTIVITIES LOSE THE CHARACTER OF BEING FOR 'CHARITABLE PURPOSE'. 9. THE FIRST AND THE FOREMOST POINT THAT IS REQUIRED TO BE ADDRESSED IS WHETHER THE ASSESSEE IS AN INSTITUTION INVOLVED IN EDUCATION OR NOT? IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THIS CONTROVERSY, WE MAY BRIEFLY TOUCH UPON THE OBJECTS OF THE ASSESSEE AS APPEARING IN THE MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION AND ALSO THE ACTIVIT IES THAT ARE BEING CARRIED OUT BY THE ASSESSEE OVER THE YEARS. THE MAIN OBJECTS OF THE ASSESSEE HAVE BEEN REPRODUCED BY US IN THE EARLIER PART OF THIS ORDER AND A PERUSAL THEREOF CLEARLY SHOWS THAT THE MAIN OBJECT OF THE ASSESSEE IS TO PROMOTE AND PROVIDE TRAINING IN OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, BESIDES ORGANISING AND FACILITATING SEMINARS, STUDY COURSES, LECTURES AND SIMILAR OTHER ACTIVITIES FOR THE SAID PURPOSE. CONSIDERING THE STATED OBJECTS, WE ARE NOT INCLINED TO ACCE PT THE PLEA OF THE REVENUE THAT THE MAIN OBJECTS OF THE ASSESSEE IS NOT 'EDUCATION'. BESIDES THE STATED OBJECTS, THE WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE BEFORE THE LOWER AUTHORITIES ALSO GIVE AN INSIGHT TO THE ACTIVITIES BEING ACTUALL Y PURSUED BY THE ASSESSEE. IT EMERGES THAT THE ASSESSEE IS RECOGNISED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF PUNE AS AN APPROVED CENTRE FOR POST - GRADUATE RESEARCH AND ALSO BY THE DEPARTMENT OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, GOVERNMEN T OF INDIA. IT IS POINTED OUT THAT ASSESSEE IS CONDUCTING POST - GRADUATE DIPLOMA COURSES AND MANY PH.D STUDENTS ARE ALSO REGISTERED WITH IT FOR THEIR DOCTORIAL DISSERTATION UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF ASSESSEE'S FACULTY MEMBERS. IT HAS ALSO BEEN POINTED OUT TH AT ASSESSEE HAS THIRTY FULL - TIME FACULTY OF ACADEMICIANS FROM A WIDE RANGE OF DISCIPLINES, VIZ., ECONOMICS, FINANCE, COMMERCE, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, COMPUTER SCIENCE, AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, ETC. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE LEARNED REPRESENTATIVE HAS ALSO EMP HASISED THAT ASSESSEE HAS CLASS ROOMS TO CONDUCT REGULAR CLASSES AND THE LIBRARY IN THE EDUCATIONAL CAMPUS HAS MORE THAN 60,000 BOOKS. IT WAS ALSO POINTED OUT THAT ASSESSEE OFFERS PROGRAMMES IN COLLABORATION WITH KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT, NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY USA, THE LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL (LSC), UK AND CME GROUP, CHICAGO, ETC. ALL THESE ASSERTIONS OF THE ASSESSEE HAVE NOT FOUND ANY NEGATION BY THE ASSESSING AUTHORITY OR EVEN BY THE REVENUE BEFORE US. 10. BEFORE US, IT WAS ARGUED B Y THE LD. DR THAT FEE IS BEING CHARGED AND SUBSCRIPTIONS ARE RECEIVED FROM THE MEMBER - BANKS WHICH GENERATES SURPLUS IN THE COURSE OF ACTIVITIES, AND THUS, THE ACTIVITIES ARE NOT FOR EDUCATION. IT IS WELL UNDERSTOOD THAT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS ARE ALSO RE QUIRED TO GENERATE FUNDS FOR CARRYING OUT ITS ACTIVITIES, AND THE FACT THAT ASSESSEE IS COLLECTING FEES, BY ITSELF, WILL NOT MAKE IT A NON - EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY SO AS TO GO OUT OF THE DEFINITION OF 'EDUCATION' CONTAINED IN SEC. 2(15) OF THE ACT. IN THIS CON TEXT, WE MAY REFER TO THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF T.M.A. PAI FOUNDATION VS STATE OF KARNATAKA , (2002) 8 SCC 481, WHEREIN THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT HAS ALSO RECOG NISED THE NEC ESSITY FOR THE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION TO GENERATE FUNDS FOR ITS BETTERMENT AND GROWTH. IN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT 4 THE CASE OF AMERICAN HOTEL & LODGING ASSOCIATION, 301 ITR 86 (SC), THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT WAS DEALING WITH AN ENTITY ENGAGED IN PROVIDING WORLD - RECOGNISED CURRIC ULUM FOR ALL HOSPITALITY EDUCATION PROGRAMS IN INDIA BY MAKING THEM AVAILABLE THROUGH TEXT, COURSE MATERIAL AND OTHER SOFTWARE PROGRAMMES IN INDIA. APART FROM ACCEPTING THIS ACTIVITY TO BE IN THE REALM OF EDUCATION, THE HON'BLE COURT ALSO OBSERVED THAT MER ELY BECAUSE SOME PROFIT WAS ARISING FROM SUCH ACTIVITY, IT WOULD NOT DISTRACT FROM HOLDING THAT SUCH AN ENTITY WAS EXISTING SOLELY FOR EDUCATION PURPOSES. THE HON'BLE COURT ALSO EXPLAINED THAT IN ORDER TO ASCERTAIN WHETHER AN ENTITY IS BEING RUN WITH THE O BJECT OF MAKING PROFIT OR NOT, THE EXISTENCE OF PROFIT IS NOT PARAMOUNT, BUT WHAT IS OF IMPORTANCE IS WHETHER OR NOT THE RESULTANT INCOME IS BEING APPLIED WHOLLY AND EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE OBJECTS FOR WHICH THE ENTITY HAS BEEN SET - UP. IN THE CONTEXT OF THE AS SESSEE BEFORE US, THERE IS NO REPUDIATION TO THE FACT - SITUATION THAT THE SURPLUS, IF ANY, IS BEING APPLIED ONLY IN FURTHERANCE OF ITS STATED OBJECTS. 11. THE LEARNED REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE US REFERRED TO THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF ASSAM TEXT BOOK PRODUCTION AND PUBLICATION CORPORATION VS CIT , 319 ITR 317 (SC), WHEREIN THE ACTIVITY IN THE FIELD OF PUBLICATION OF TEXT BOOKS WAS ALSO HELD TO BE AN ACTIVITY FALLING WITHIN THE SCOP E OF 'EDUCATION'. SIMILARLY, THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF GUJARAT STATE CO - OPERATIVE UNION VS CIT , 195 ITR 279 (GUJ.) HAS ALSO BEEN RELIED UPON. IN THE CASE OF GUJARAT ST ATE CO - OPERATIVE UNION (SUPRA), ASSESSEE WAS ENGAGED IN CONDUCTING COURSES FOR HIGHER DIPLOMA IN CO - OPERATION, DIPLOMA IN LAND DEVELOPMENT BANKING, CERTIFICATE COURSE IN CO - OPERATIVE CREDIT AND BANKING AND SPECIALISED SHORT - TERM COURSES/ ORIENTATION COURSE S. THE ASSESSEE THEREIN WAS ALSO CONDUCTING SEMINARS AND RUNNING TRAINING CENTRES FOR EMPLOYEES OF URBAN CO - OPERATIVE BANKS, DISTRICT CO - OPERATIVE BANKS, ETC. THE HON'BLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT UNDERSTOOD SUCH ACTIVITIES TO BE FALLING WITHIN THE EXPRESSION 'ED UCATION'. IN COMING TO SUCH A CONCLUSION, THE HON'BLE COURT REFERRED TO THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF SOLE TRUSTEE, LOKA SHIKSHANA TRUST VS. CIT , 101 ITR 234 (SC) TO CONTEND T HAT THE WORD 'EDUCATION' SHOULD NOT BE CONFINED ONLY TO SCHOLASTIC INSTRUCTIONS, BUT OTHER FORMS OF EDUCATION ARE ALSO INCLUDED IN THE EXPRESSION 'EDUCATION'. THOUGH THE DECISION OF THE HON'BLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT IS IN THE CONTEXT OF SEC. 10(22) OF THE ACT , YET, IT IS OF RELEVANCE FOR US SINCE IT HAS EXPLAINED THE MEANING OF THE EXPRESSION 'EDUCATION' WHICH, IN OUR VIEW, IS GERMANE TO DECIDE THE CONTROVERSY BEFORE US. THE ASSESSEE BEFORE US IS INDISPUTABLY ENGAGED IN CONDUCTING HIGHER EDUCATION TRAINING, CO ACHING AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF BANKING AND FINANCE, AND THE RATIO OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT CERTAINLY GOES TO SHOW THAT ITS ACTIVITIES ARE IN THE FIELD OF 'EDUCATION' FOR THE PURPOSES OF SEC. 2(15) OF THE ACT. 12. SIMILARLY, TH E DECISION OF THE MUMBAI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF INDIAN INSTITUTE OF BANKERS VS DCIT (EXEMPTION ), (2002) 74 TTJ 523 (MUM) WAS ALSO RELIED UPON. THE ASSESSEE BEFORE THE MUMBAI BENCH OF THE T RIBUNAL, I.E. INDIAN INSTITUTE OF BANKERS, WAS ENGAGED IN THE ACTIVITY OF PROMOTING THE STUDY OF THEORY OF BANKING AND, FOR THAT PURPOSE, IT WAS CONDUCTING EXAMS, LECTURES, ETC. NOTABLY, THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE BEFORE US ARE ALSO ON THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT 5 SAME LINES A ND THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF INDIAN INSTITUTE OF BANKERS (SUPRA) ACCEPTED THOSE ACTIVITIES TO BE IN THE NATURE OF 'EDUCATION'. 13. IN VIEW OF OUR AFORESAID DISCUSSION, WE DO NOT FIND ANY MERIT IN THE STAND OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER THAT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE ARE NOT IN THE FIELD OF 'EDUCATION'. WHAT HAS BEEN EMPHASISED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER IS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS CONDUCTING COACHING CLASSES IN THE FIELD OF BANKING AND FINANCE AND, THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE HON'BLE PATNA HIGH COU RT IN THE CASE OF BIHAR INSTITUTE OF MINING & MINE SURVEYING VS CIT , 208 ITR 608 (PAT), IT COULD NOT BE SAID THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS CARRYING OUT ANY 'EDUCATION' ACTIVITY. IN THIS CONTEXT, WE MAY REFER TO THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF DIT(E) VS AHMEDABAD MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, [2014] 47 TAXMANN.COM 162 (GUJARAT), WHEREIN THE ASSOCIATION UNDERTOOK MULTIFACETED ACTIVITY, VIZ. CONDUCTING CONTINUING EDUCATION, DIPLOMA & CERTIFI CATE PROGRAMME, MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES, PUBLIC TALKS, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, ETC. SUCH LIKE ACTIVITIES WERE ALSO HELD TO BE IN THE NATURE OF 'EDUCATION' ELIGIBLE FOR THE BENEFIT OF SECTIONS 11 & 12 OF THE ACT. IN FACT, THE HON'BLE DELHI HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF COUNCIL FOR THE INDIAN SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATIONS VS DGIT(E), 362 ITR 436 (DELHI) WAS CONSIDERING THE ACTIVITIES OF AN ASSESSEE WHO WAS NEITHER CONDUCTING ANY CLASSES AND NOR WAS DIRECTLY ENGAGED IN TEACHING STUDENTS, BUT WAS ONLY AFFILIATING SCHOOLS, PRESCRIBING SYLLABUS AND CONDUCTING EXAMINATIONS. THE INSTITUTION CARRYING OUT SUCH ACTIVITIES WAS ALSO UNDERSTOOD BY THE HON'BLE C OURT TO BE AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION. 14. WHEN WE APPLY THE AFORESAID PRINCIPLES TO THE ADMITTED NATURE OF ACTIVITIES IN THE PRESENT CASE, WE HAVE NO HESITATION IN HOLDING THAT ASSESSEE IS AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION AND, THEREFORE, IT FALLS WITHIN THE SCO PE OF THE EXPRESSION 'CHARITABLE PURPOSE' CONTAINED IN SEC. 2(15) OF THE ACT. 15. NOW, WE MAY DEAL WITH THE REFERENCE TO PROVISO TO SEC. 2(15) OF THE ACT MADE BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER. PERTINENTLY, THE PROVISO TO SEC. 2(15) OF THE ACT IS RELEVANT QUA THE A CTIVITY OF 'ADVANCEMENT OF ANY OTHER OBJECT OF GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITY' CONTAINED IN SEC. 2(15) OF THE ACT AND NOT IN RELATION TO OTHER LIMBS OF ACTIVITIES CONTAINED THEREIN. WHILE IN THE EARLIER PARAS WE HAVE ALREADY HELD THAT THE ASSESSEE IS ENGAGED IN 'E DUCATION', THEREFORE, ON THIS BASIS, IT WILL BE IN THE FITNESS OF THINGS TO DEDUCE THAT ASSESSEE IS NOT OUSTED FROM SEC. 2(15) OF THE ACT BECAUSE THE PROVISO IS NOT APPLICABLE TO IT. IN ANY CASE, IF ONE IS TO EXAMINE THE APPLICABILITY OF THE PROVISO ON MER IT, EVEN THEN WE FIND THAT THE SAME DOES NOT COME INTO OPERATION IN THE PRESENT CASE. FIRSTLY, THE CBDT IN ITS CIRCULAR NO. 11/2008 DATED 19.12.2008 CLARIFIED THAT THE PROVISO WOULD APPLY ONLY IN SITUATIONS WHERE THERE IS A PROFIT MOTIVE IN THE ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN. SECONDLY, THE PHRASEOLOGY OF THE PROVISO ITSELF LENDS CREDENCE TO A PREMISE THAT IT COMES INTO OPERATION ONLY IN SITUATIONS WHERE PROFIT IS THE MOTIVE IN THE ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN. PERTINENTLY, THE PROVISO APPLIES IN A SITUATION 'IF IT INVOLVES CARRYING ON OF ANY ACTIVITY IN THE NATURE OF TRADE, COMMERCE OR BUSINESS OR ANY ACTIVITY OF RENDERING ANY SERVICES IN RELATION TO ANY TRADE, COMMERCE OR BUSINESS..........'. OSTENSIBLY, THE THREE EXPRESSIONS USED THEREIN, I.E., 'TRADE', 'COMMERCE' OR 'BUS INESS' ARE TO BE UNDERSTOOD AS ACTIVITIES WHICH ARE UNDERTAKEN WITH A MOTIVE OF EARNING PROFITS. THEREFORE, THE MOOT QUESTION TO BE EXAMINED IS AS TO WHETHER OR NOT NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT 6 THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE CAN BE CONSTRUED TO BE INTENDED FOR A PROFIT MOTIVE OR FOR A COMMERCIAL INTENT, AS SOUGHT TO BE MADE OUT BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER. IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE SAID POINT, WE MAY TOUCH UPON THE MANNER AND PURPORT FOR WHICH ASSESSEE HAS BEEN SET - UP. AS NOTED BY US BRIEFLY IN THE EARLIER PART OF THIS O RDER, ASSESSEE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA THROUGH THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA. IN THE PAPER BOOK FILED BEFORE US, APART FROM OTHER THINGS, A REPORT OF A COMMITTEE APPOINTED BY THE RBI ON 'THE TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHER BANKING PERSONNEL' OF 1969 HA S BEEN PLACED. IN 1969, NATIONALISATION OF BANKS UNDERTAKEN BY THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA BROUGHT IN THE POLICY OF SOCIAL CONTROL OVER BANKING WHICH INTENDED TO PROVIDE A NEW DIRECTION TO THE BANKING INDUSTRY IN INDIA. SINCE BANKING WAS MADE A MORE EFFECTIVE INSTRUMENT OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, IT WAS RECOGNISED THAT APPROPRIATE PERSONNEL POLICIES HAD TO BE EVOLVED IN ORDER TO ENCOURAGE THE RIGHT ATTITUDES TO DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT SKILLS, CAPABILITIES AND ALSO TO IMPART NEW TECHNOLOGICAL SKILLS. THE COMMITT EE APPOINTED BY THE RBI IN THIS DIRECTION MADE A MAJOR RECOMMENDATION FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT. THIS WAS A PRECURSOR TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ASSESSEE BY THE RBI IN CONSULTATION WITH THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA IN 1969 AS AN AUTONOMOUS NON - PROFIT INSTITUTION IN THE AREA OF BANKING AND FINANCE. THE COMMITTEE ON TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHER BANKING PERSONNEL CARVED OUT THE ROLE OF ASSESSEE AS BEING AN ENTITY TO 'TRANSLATE NATIONAL POLICIES RELATING TO THE BANKING SEC TOR INTO MEANINGFUL TRAINING PROGRAMMES AT THE LEVEL OF INDIVIDUAL BANK AND HELP THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THOSE POLICIES BY CREATING A CLIMATE OF INTELLECTUAL APPRECIATION AND EMOTIONAL DEDICATION'. THEREFORE, LOOKING AT THE BACKGROUND OF THE FORMATION OF THE ASSESSEE AND ITS STATED OBJECTS, WHICH WE HAVE REPRODUCED IN THE EARLIER PART OF THIS ORDER, THE ASSESSEE - INSTITUTE WAS TO ACT AS A CATALYST FOR THE NEW BANKING POLICY OF THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA TOWARDS EVOLVING APPROPRIATE GUIDELINES FOR BANKS IN THE ARE AS OF MANAGEMENT CAPABILITIES AND IMPROVING THE TECHNICAL EXPERTISE OF BANKING AND AWARENESS OF NATIONAL PRIORITIES IN THE BANKING PROFESSION. THE STATED OBJECTS CLEARLY BRING OUT THA T THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE ARE EXCLUSIVELY IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATIO N AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF BANKING AND FINANCE. NOT ELABORATING FURTHER ON THIS ASPECT, AS WE HAVE ALREADY INFERRED EARLIER THAT ASSESSEE IS IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION, AT THIS STAGE IT WOULD SUFFICE FOR US TO NOTE THAT THERE IS NO COMMERCIAL INTENT BEH IND SETTING - UP OF THE ASSESSEE. IN FACT, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS SOUGHT TO DRAW A PARALLEL WITH THE CASE BEFORE THE HON'BLE PATNA HIGH COURT IN BIHAR INSTITUTE OF MINING & MINE SURVEYING (SUPRA) WHICH, IN OUR VIEW, IS WHOLLY INAPPROPRIATE. THE HON'BLE PA TNA HIGH COURT WAS DEALING WITH THE CLAIM OF AN ENTITY FOR REGISTRATION U/S 12 A OF THE ACT ON THE GROUND THAT ITS ACTIVITY OF COACHING OF STUDENTS FOR PARTICULAR EXAMINATIONS WAS TO BE VIEWED AS IMPARTI NG EDUCATION. THE HON'BLE COURT NOTED THAT 'THE RUNNING OF A PRIVATE COACHING INSTITUTE FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRAINING THE STUDENTS TO APPEAR AT SOME SPECIFIED EXAMINATIONS UPON TAKING SPECIFIED SUM FROM THE TRAINEES WOULD NOT BRING THE PETITIONER WITHIN THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 2(15) OF THE ACT.' THE AFORESAID OBSERVATION OF THE HON'BLE COURT CLEARLY BRING OUT THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE ENTITY BEFORE US AND THAT WAS BEFORE THE HON'BLE PATNA HIGH COURT, WH ICH WAS A CASE OF A PRIVATE COACHING INSTITUTE WHEREAS, AS WE HAVE SEEN EARLIER, THE COMPLEXION OF THE ENTITY BEFORE US IS ON A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FOOTING; THE ENTITY BEFORE US HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA THROUGH RBI AS A MEANS TO NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT 7 FUR THER THE NATIONAL POLICY RELATING TO BANKING SECTOR CONSEQUENT TO NATIONALISATION OF BANKS IN 1969. IN OUR CONSIDERED OPINION, THE OBJECTIVES FOR WHICH THE ASSESSEE IS SET - UP AND THE MANNER IN WHICH IT IS MANAGED, I.E., THROUGH A GOVERNING BOARD CONSISTING , INTER - ALIA, OF NOMINEES OF THE GOVERNMENT AND MEMBER - NATIONALISED BANKS, IT CAN HARDLY BE SAID THAT THERE IS ANY PROFIT MOTIVE IN CARRYING OUT ITS ACTIVITIES. NO DOUBT, THERE MAY REMAIN SOME SURPLUS IN THE COURSE OF CARRYING ON ACTIVITIES SINCE ASSESSEE IS UNDERTAKING PROGRAMMES BY CHARGING FEE AND/OR SUBSCRIPTION FROM ITS MEMBER NATIONALISED BANKS, ETC., BUT THAT BY ITSELF WILL NOT MEAN THAT THE MOTIVE IS TO EARN PROFIT. IN FACT, THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF AMERICAN HOTEL & LODGING ASSOCIAT ION (SUPRA) NOTED THAT IT MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE TO CARRY ON ACTIVITIES IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE EXPENDITURE EXACTLY MATCHES THE INCOME AND THERE IS NO RESULTANT PROFIT. AS PER THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT, SUCH AN OBJECTIVE IS NOT ONLY DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE FOR PR ACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS, BUT ALSO REFLECTS UNSOUND PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT. TO REITERATE WHAT WE HAVE NOTED EARLIER, IN SUCH A SITUATION, THE TEST TO EXAMINE THE EXISTENCE OR OTHERWISE OF PROFIT MOTIVE IS TO FIND OUT THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE RESULTANT SUR PLUS IS BEING APPLIED FOR. FACTUALLY SPEAKING, IN THE PRESENT CASE, THERE IS NO ALLEGATION, MUCH LESS ANY EVIDENCE, BROUGHT OUT BY THE REVENUE TO SAY THAT ANY AMOUNT HAS BEEN APPLIED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN ITS STATED OBJECTS, WHICH OSTENSI BLY IS IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION. PERTINENTLY, UPTO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008 - 09, ASSESSEE WAS ACCEPTED TO BE AN ENTITY ENGAGED IN EDUCATION AND IN EVEN IN THE CAPTIONED YEARS THERE IS NO CHARGE AGAINST THE ASSESSEE THAT ANY OF ITS ACTIVITIES HAVE UNDERGONE ANY CHANGE. THEREFORE, MERELY BECAUSE OF INSERTION OF THE PROVISO, THE NATURE OF ACTIVITIES DO NOT UNDERGO A CHANGE UNLESS IT CAN BE MADE OUT THAT PROFIT MOTIVE IS DOMINANT ALL - PERVADING IN THE ACTIVITIES, AN ASPECT WHICH IS ABSOLUTELY ABSENT IN THE PRESENT C ASE. THEREFORE, EVEN IF WE WERE TO GO ALONG WITH THE STAND OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER THAT THE ACTIVITIES OF ASSESSEE FALL WITHIN THE EXPRESSION 'ADVANCEMENT OF ANY OTHER OBJECT OF GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITY' CONTAINED IN SEC. 2(15) OF THE ACT, EVEN THEN, FROM A SSESSMENT YEAR 2009 - 10 ONWARDS, THE INSERTION OF PROVISO DOES NOT TAKE AWAY THE BENEFITS OF SECTIONS 11 & 12 OF THE ACT FROM THE ASSESSEE INASMUCH A S THE PROVISO DOES NOT DISENTITLE THE ASSESSEE'S ACTIVITIES FROM BEING CONSIDERED AS FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSE BECAUSE OF THE ABOVE DISCUSSION. THUS, ON THIS ASPECT ALSO, WE UPHOLD THE STAND OF THE ASSESSEE. 8. R ESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE PRECEDENT AS ABOVE WE UPHOLD THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT - A . HENCE REVENUES APPEALS STAND DISMISSED . A SSESSEE'S APPEAL S : 9. T HE ISSUE RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE IN COMMON IN THESE APPEALS IS THAT LEARNED CIT - A HAS NOT ADJUDICATED CERTAIN OTHER ISSUES RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE AS UNDER : - (I) APPLICABILITY OF EXEMPTION U/S. 10(23C) (II) ADDITION OF AMOUNT UTILISED FROM ACCUMULATION OF EARLIER YEARS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT 8 (III) NOT ALLOWING VARIOUS EXPENDITURE (IV) ACCUMULATION OF INCOME. 10. U PON CAREFUL CONSIDERA TION WE FIND THAT ASSESSEE'S GR I E VANCE IS CORRECT. ALL GROUNDS RELAT ING TO THE ABOVE ISSUES WERE RAISED BEFORE THE LEARNED CIT - A, WHO HAS NOT ADJUDICATED THE SAME. HENCE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE , WE REMIT THE S E I SSUE S T O THE FILE OF LEARNED CIT - A . L EARNED CIT(A) SHALL DECIDED TH E S E I SSUE S ON MERITS BY A SPEAKING ORDER AFT ER GIVING THE ASS E SSEE PROPER OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD. 11. IN THE RESULT ASSESSEE'S APPEAL S ARE ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. IN THE RESULT THESE APPEALS THAT DISPOSED OF AS UNDER : - (I) ITA NO. 3871/MUM/2018 - IS DISMISSED. (II) ITA NO. 3872/MUM/2018 - ALL OWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. (III) ITA NO. 3873/MUM/2018 - ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. (IV) ITA NO. 4238/MUM/2018 DISMISSED. (V) ITA NO. 4239/MUM/2018 DISMISSED. ORDER HAS BE EN PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 2.8 . 201 9 . SD/ - SD/ - (SANDEEP GOSAIN ) (SH A MIM YAHYA ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI ; DATED : 2 / 8 / 20 1 9 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR, IT AT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// ( ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ) PS ITAT, MUMBAI