Television Eighteen India Ltd., New Delhi V. ACIT, New Delhi

ITA 3885/DEL/2010

• Counselvise Citation: 388520114 RSA 2010
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 19 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 06-09-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: I1
• Next Hearing Date: 28-12-2016
• Assessment Year: 2004-2005
• Appeal Filed On: 17-08-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: REENA S PURI

Judgement Text

ITA NO. 3885/DEL/2010 A.Y. 2004-05 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH H: NEW DELHI DELHI BENCH H: NEW DELHI DELHI BENCH H: NEW DELHI DELHI BENCH H: NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND BEFORE SMT. DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI K.D. RANJAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI K.D. RANJAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI K.D. RANJAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI K.D. RANJAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A.NO. 3885/DEL/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2004-05 TELEVISION EIGHTEEN INDIA LTD. VS. ACIT 601, 6 TH FLOOR, HOTEL LE MERIDIEN CIRCLE 16 (1), COMMERCIAL TOWER, NEW DELHI. NEW DELHI AAACT2659P (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI REENA S PURI C IT DR O R D E R O R D E R O R D E R O R D E R PER DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER PER DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER PER DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER PER DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORD ER DATED 28.6.2010 OF CIT(A)-XX, NEW DELHI PERTAINING TO 200 4-05 ASSTT.YEAR. 2. NO ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THE APPE AL WAS PASSED OVER IN THE FIRST ROUND. IN THE SECOND ROUND ALSO NO ONE WAS PRESENT. IT IS FURTHER SEEN THAT NO REQUEST FOR ADJOURN MENT OR OTHERWISE WAS MOVED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THE RECORD SHOWS THAT NOTICE WAS SENT ON 5 TH AUGUST, 2011 TO THE ADDRESS GIVEN BY THE ASSESSEE IN COLUMN NO. 10 OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL. FROM THE ABOVE IT IS EVIDENT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN THE PROSECUTION OF APPEAL. 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN VIEW THE PROV ISIONS OF ORDER V RULE 19A OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RUL ES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PV T. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 4 80 (MP), CIT VS. B.N. BHATTACHARGEE AND ANOTHER, REPORTED IN 118 ITR 461 [RELEVANT PAGES ITA NO. 3885/DEL/2010 A.Y. 2004-05 2 477 & 478], LATE MRS. BANU E COWASJI VS. CIT 276 ITR 594 (MP) WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO A DVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECAL LING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AN D IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 6 TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING. SD/- SD/- (K.D. RANJAN) (K.D. RANJAN) (K.D. RANJAN) (K.D. RANJAN) (DIVA SINGH) (DIVA SINGH) (DIVA SINGH) (DIVA SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 6 TH SEPTEMBER, 2011 VEENA COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR BY ORDER DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ITAT.