Centre for the study of Developing Society, New Delhi V. DIT(E), New Delhi

ITA 3890/DEL/2009

• Counselvise Citation: [2014] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 81572 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 11 month(s) 18 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-09-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 01-12-2016
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 15-09-2009
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

ITA NO. 3890/DEL/2009 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH B, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 3890/DEL/2009 A.Y. : 2009-10 CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF DEVELOPING SOCIETIES, 29, RAJPUR ROAD, DELHI 110 054 (PAN: AAATC5038N) VS. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PLOT NO. 15, 3 RD FLOOR, AAYKAR BHAVAN, LAXMI NAGAR DISTRICT CENTRE, DELHI 110 092 (APPELLANT) (APPELLANT) (APPELLANT) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) (RESPONDENT) (RESPONDENT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY : MS. PARWENDER K A U R , SR.DR DATE OF HEARING: DATE OF HEARING: DATE OF HEARING: DATE OF HEARING: 0 00 03 33 3. .. .9 99 9.2014 .2014 .2014 .2014 DATE OF ORDER : DATE OF ORDER : DATE OF ORDER : DATE OF ORDER : 0 00 03 33 3. .. .9 99 9.2014 .2014 .2014 .2014 ORDER ORDER ORDER ORDER PER PER PER PER H.S. SIDHU H.S. SIDHU H.S. SIDHU H.S. SIDHU : : : : J JJ JM MM M THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST T HE ORDER DATED 02.7.2009 PASSED BY THE LD. DIRECTOR OF INCOM E TAX (EXEMPTIONS), DELHI U/S. 80G(5)(VI) OF THE I.T. AC T, 1961 READ WITH RULE 11AA OF THE INCOME TAX RULES, 1962 RELEVA NT TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. THE AFORESAID CASE LASTLY CAME UP FOR HEARING B EFORE THE BENCH ON 21.5.2014 AND ON THAT DATE THE CASE WAS A DJOURNED FOR TODAY I.E. 03.9.2014, FOR WHICH BOTH THE PARTIE S WERE INFORMED IN THE OPEN COURT. ON 03.9.2014, NEITHER T HE ASSESSEE NOR ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDED THE ITA NO. 3890/DEL/2009 2 HEARING AND ALSO NOT FILED ANY APPLICATION FOR A DJOURNMENT. IT IS THUS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTE D IN PROSECUTION OF ITS APPEAL. 3. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FO LLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN CLUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. : 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) AND HO NBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURTS DECISION IN ESTATE OF LATE TU KOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE TREAT THIS AP PEAL AS UNADMITTED AND DISMISS THE SAME. 4. AS A RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMI SSED IN LIMINE. 5. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT SOON AFTER CO NCLUSION OF HEARING ON 03 RD SEPTEMBER, 2014. SD/ SD/ SD/ SD/- -- - SD/ SD/ SD/ SD/- -- - [ [[ [G.D. AGRAWAL G.D. AGRAWAL G.D. AGRAWAL G.D. AGRAWAL] ]] ] [ [[ [H.S. SIDHU H.S. SIDHU H.S. SIDHU H.S. SIDHU] ]] ] VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL JUDICIAL JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER SRBHATNAGAR SRBHATNAGAR SRBHATNAGAR SRBHATNAGAR COPY FORWARDED TO: COPY FORWARDED TO: COPY FORWARDED TO: COPY FORWARDED TO: - -- - 1. APPELLANT - 2. RESPONDENT - 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT TRUE COPY BY ORDER, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, DELHI BENCHES