IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH, AGRA BEFORE SHRI R.K. GUPTA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI P.K. BANSAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.39/AGR/2009 ASST. YEAR: 2001-02 DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VS. SMT. SUNITA AGARWAL , AGRA. 30/121, AZAD GALI, JOHRI BAZAR, AGRA. (PAN : ABZPA 1228 J). (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : NONE ORDER PER P.K. BANSAL, A.M.: THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FIELD BY THE REVENUE AGAINST T HE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) DATED 26.11.2008. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AS WELL AS REVENUE. 3. WE NOTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT IN THIS APPEAL FILE D BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) IS LES THAN RS.2,00,000/- AND THE SAME IS IN CONTRAVENTION OF C.B.D.T. INSTRUCTION NO.5 OF 2008 DATED 15.05.2008 WHICH FINDS STATUTORY FORCE U NDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 268A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961. THE SAME IS, THEREFORE, NOT MAINTAINABLE. THE CLAUSE NO.3 OF THE SAID C.B.D.T. INSTRUCTION HAS MADE IT CLEAR THAT APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL BY THE REVENUE WILL HENCEFORTH BE FILED WHERE TAX EFFECT EXCEEDS RS.2 L ACS. THEREFORE, IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND FACTS 2 OF THE CASE, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE AND THE SAME IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS DI SMISSED. (ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 24.06.2010). SD/- SD/- (R.K. GUPTA) (P.K. BANSAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PLACE: AGRA DATE: 24 TH JUNE, 2010. PBN/* COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT BY ORDER 3. CIT CONCERNED 4. CIT (APPEALS) CONCERNED 5. DR, ITAT, AGRA BENCH, AGRA 6. GUARD FILE ASSIST ANT REGISTRAR INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AGRA TRUE COPY