Meeta A Jethwani, Hyderabad V. Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Hyderabad

ITA 390/HYD/2014

• Counselvise Citation: 39022514 RSA 2014
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 6 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-09-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 21-09-2015
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 07-03-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: S K GUPTA
• Assessee Lawyers: N O N E

Judgement Text

ITA NO.390 OF 2014 MEETA A JETHWANI HYDERABAD PAGE 1 OF 2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD A BENCH, HYDERABAD BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B. RAMAKOTAIAH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.390/HYD/2014 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-10) SMT. MEETA A JETHWANI 4-1 952/31 TILAK ROAD HYDERABAD PAN: ACIPM 1864 C VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE IV HYDERABAD (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) FOR ASSESSEE : N O N E FOR REVENUE : SHRI S.K. GUPTA, DR DATE OF HEARING : 21 .09 .2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 21 .09. 201 5 O R D E R PER SMT.P. MADHAVI DEVI, J.M. THIS IS ASSESSEES APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT-IV, HYDERABAD, DATED 10.02.2014 CONFIRMING CERTAIN DISA LLOWANCES MADE BY THE AO PERTAINING TO A.Y 2009-10. THE APPEA L WAS INITIALLY FIXED FOR HEARING ON 17.06.2014, AT WHICH TIME THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE WAS PRESENT IN THE COURT. AT THE REQUESTS OF THE ASSESSEE, APPEAL WAS ADJOURNED TO 25.8.2014, 24.12.2014, 14.5.2015, 03.07.2015 AND 21.09.2015. H OWEVER, NONE APPEARED FOR THE ASSESSEE ON THE DATE OF HEARI NG 21.09.2015. IN VIEW OF THE SAME, WE PRESUME THAT TH E ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED TO PROCEED FURTHER AND RESPECTFUL LY FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE COORDINATE BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 (D EL), AS ALSO ITA NO.390 OF 2014 MEETA A JETHWANI HYDERABAD PAGE 2 OF 2 THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COU RT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, RE PORTED IN 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND FURTHER THE DECISION OF THE HONB LE BOMBAY HIGH COURT DATED 17.09.2010 IN THE CASE OF M/S. CHE MIPOL VS. UNION OF INDIA IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 62 OF 2009, WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL AS UN-ADMITTED FOR WANT OF PROS ECUTION BY THE ASSESSEE. 2. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS D ISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 21 ST SEPTEMBER, 2015. S D/ - S D/ - (B. RAMAKOTAIAH) (P. MADHAVI DEVI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER HYDERABAD, DATED 21 ST SEPTEMBER, 2015. VNODAN/SPS COPY TO: 1. SMT. MEETA A. JETHWANI, 4-1-10/B-12 SHEETAL, TILA K ROAD, HYDERABAD 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE IV, 3 RD FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, BASHEEGBAGH, HYDERABAD 3. ADD. CIT, RANGE 5 HYDERABAD 4. THE DR, ITAT, HYDERABAD 5. GUARD FILE BY ORDER