IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH G : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.3927/DEL./2015 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12) SMT. RANJU SAYALL, VS. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 20, 6, JAIN BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. 12, BHAGAT SINGH MARG, NEW DELHI - 110 001. (PAN : BQNPS3663M) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI S.S. RANA, CIT DR DATE OF HEARING : 20.09.2018 DATE OF ORDER : 20.09.2018 O R D E R PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER : THE APPELLANT, SMT. RANJU SAYALL, BY FILING THE PRE SENT APPEAL, SOUGHT TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATE D 21.02.2015 PASSED BY LD. CIT (A)-2, NEW DELHI QUA THE ASSESSME NT YEAR 2011-12. 2. IN THE PRESENT APPEAL, NOTICE WAS SENT THROUGH R PAD TO THE ASSESSEE FOR HEARING ON 20.09.2018 BUT THE APPELLAN T HAS NOT PREFERRED TO PUT IN HIS APPEARANCE HIMSELF OR THROU GH HIS AUTHORIZED ITA NO.3927/DEL./2015 2 REPRESENTATIVE NOR SENT ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT . SO, IT IS APPARENT ON RECORD THAT THE APPELLANT IS NOT INTERE STED IN PROSECUTION OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. 3. KEEPING IN VIEW THE LEGAL POSITION THAT MERE ISS UANCE OF NOTICE DOES NOT AMOUNT TO ADMISSION OF APPEAL AND T HIS ISSUE HAS BEEN SQUARELY DECIDED BY HONBLE ITAT IN THE CASE O F CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL.), THE PRESENT APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION WITH LIBER TY TO THE ASSESSEE TO FILE AN APPLICATION TO RECALL THE ORDER SUBJECT TO DEMONSTRATE THAT HE WAS PREVENTED BY SUFFICIENT CAU SE FROM PUTTING HIS APPEARANCE AT THE TIME OF HEARING. 4. IN VIEW OF ABOVE, APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE IS D ISMISSED AS UNADMITTED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON THIS 20 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018 AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING. SD/- SD/- (PRASHANT MAHARISHI) (KULDIP SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED THE 20 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018/TS COPY FORWARDED TO: 1.APPELLANT 2.RESPONDENT 3.CIT 4.CIT(A)-2, NEW DELHI. 5.CIT(ITAT), NEW DELHI. AR, ITAT NEW DELHI.