M/s Fidelity Information Services India Pvt. Ltd., Chandigarh V. JCIT, (OSD), C-1(1), Chandigarh

ITA 393/CHANDI/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2138 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 10 month(s) 21 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 23-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 02-04-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: C CHANDRAKANTA
• Assessee Lawyers: A NKIT SAHNI; MRS SUMISHA MURGAI

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, A CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT & SHRI R.L NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ./ ITA NO. 393/CHD/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 FIDELITY INFORMATION SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, 5 TH FLOOR, LANDMARK PLAZA, QUARKCITY (SEZ), INDUSTRIAL FOCAL POINT, A-40A, PHASE VIII B, EXTENSION, MOHALI-160059 THE JCIT, CIRCLE CHANDIGARH ./PAN NO: AAGCS0395D / APPELLANT /RESPONDENT HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING /ASSESSEE BY : SHRI ANKIT SAHNI, ADVOCATE & MRS. SUMISHA MURGAI CA / REVENUE BY : SMT. C CHANDRAKANTA, CIT /DATE OF HEARING : 23.02.2021 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 23.02.2021 / ORDER PER R.L. NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER: THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE CAPTIONED APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18.12.2017 PASSED BY THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL-1 NEW DELHI, PERTAINING TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 VIDE WHIC H THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL-1, NEW DELHI HAS DISMISSED THE APP EAL OF THE ASSESSEE FILED AGAINST THE ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED U/S 143(3 ) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (FOR SHORT 'THE ACT'). 2. AT THE OUTSET, LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUB MITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE ISSUES IN THE SAID APPEAL UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME 2020. THE L D. COUNSEL 2 FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT AN APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWA L OF THE SAID APPEAL HAS ALREADY BEEN FILED. HENCE, THE SAME MAY BE ALLOWED AND THE ASSESSEE MAY BE PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE SAID APPEAL. 3. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT OPP OSE THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. 4. IN VIEW OF THE SUBMISSIONS MADE BY THE LD. COUN SEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, WE ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASS ESSEE AND ACCORDINGLY DISMISS THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 23.02.2021. SD/- SD/- ( N.K. SAINI) (R.L.NEGI) / VICE PRESIDENT / JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 23.02.2021 . . / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT 3. / CIT 4. ( )/ THE CIT(A) 5. , , / DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. / GUARD FILE / BY ORDER, / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR