IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH `D : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI K.G. BANSAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.3932/DEL./2011 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08) KASHMIR SINGH GILL, VS. ITO, WARD 22(4), 229, DSIDC SHEDS, NEW DELHI. OKHLA INDL. AREA PHASE-I, NEW DELHI. (PAN/GIR NO.AAIPG8537E) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI VIKAS K. SURYAWANSHI, DR ORDER PER U.B.S. BEDI, J.M. THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE EMANATES FROM THE ORDER OF THE CIT (A)-XXIII, NEW DELHI, DATED 08.10.2011, RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEA R 2007-08. 2. DESPITE SENDING NOTICE OF HEARING SUFFICIENTLY I N ADVANCE, NEITHER ASSESSEE ATTENDED NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT REQUEST HAS BEEN RECEI VED AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, WE INFER THAT THE ASSESSEE IS N OT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF THIS APPEAL. 3. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES, 1963 AND FOLLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 (DEL.) AND THE JUDGMENT OF H ONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 I.T.R. 480 (MP), WE TREAT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE AS UNADMITTED AND DISMISS T HE SAME. I.T.A. NO.3932/DEL./2011 (A.Y. : 2007-08) 2 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT SOON AFTER THE CONC LUSION OF THE HEARING ON 29.05.2012. SD/- SD/- (K.G. BANSAL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (U.B.S. BEDI ) JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : MAY 29, 2012 SKB COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A)-XXIII, NEW DELHI. 5. CIT(ITAT) DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ITAT