IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI Before Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member Sh. Yogesh Kumar US, Judicial Member ITA No. 3970/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 ACIT, Circle-7(2), New Delhi-110002 Vs Dragonfly Education Pvt. Ltd., 54, Anand Lok, New Delhi-110049 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AADCD2515R Assessee by : Sh. S. Krishnan, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. Lalit Kishore, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 24.05.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 27.06.2022 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-3, New Delhi, dated 11.03.2019. 2. As per the instant Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08/08/2019 inforce, the CBDT in supersession of earlier instructions has directed that department’s appeals before ITAT shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs. 50 lacs. The tax will not include any interest thereon. It is further clarified that even if in the case of an assessee, disputed issues arise in more than one assessment year, appeal cannot be filed in respect of such assessment year or years in which the tax effect in respect of disputed issues exceeds the monetary limit so specified. ITA No. 3970/Del/2019 Dragonfly Education Pvt. Ltd. 2 3. Admittedly, in the departmental appeal, the tax effect is less than Rs. 50 lacs, therefore, departmental appeal is not maintainable. The Ld. DR could not bring to our notice any exceptions mentioned in the said Circular. 4. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 27/06/2022. Sd/- Sd/- (Yogesh Kumar US) (Dr. B. R. R. Kumar) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 27/06/2022 *Subodh Kumar, Sr. PS* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR