IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM & DR. A. L. SAINI, AM ./ITA NO.40/AHD/2015 ( [ [ / ASSESSMENT YEAR: (2009-10) (VIRTUAL COURT HEARING) MR. TEJASHKUMAR BALUBHAI PATEL, C-203, NANDININ-II, VESU, SURAT. VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(4), SURAT. ./ ./ PAN/GIR NO.: ASCPP 6083 A (ASSESSEE) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : SHRI RAKESH SHAH - CA RESPONDENT BY : SMT. ANUPAMA SINGLA SR. DR / DATE OF HEARING : 12/01/2021 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 12/01/2021 / O R D E R PER DR. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: AT THE OUTSET ITSELF, WE NOTE THAT THE LEARNED AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS SETTLED THE DISPUTE WITH THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT UNDER VIVAD SE VISVAS SCHEME -2020 (VSV-20). THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY RECEIVED FORM-3 OF VSV-20 AND PRAYED THAT THE ASSESSEE MAY KINDLY BE ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL TO WHICH , THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT RAISE ANY OBJECTION. 2. WE HAVE HEARD LD.SR.DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE(DR) FOR THE REVENUE AND THE LD.AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE. WE NOTE THAT ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY SETTLED THE DISPUTE WITH REVENUE. THE LD.SR.DR FOR THE REVENUE DID NOT HAVE ANY PAGE | 2 ITA NO.40/AHD/2015 FOR A.Y.2009-10 MR.TEJASHKUMAR BALUBHAI PATEL VS.ITO, WARD- 4(4), SURAT OBJECTION IF THE SAID APPEAL IS WITHDRAWN BY THE ASSESSEE. CONSEQUENTLY, WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE (IN ITA NO.40/AHD/2015 FOR AY.2009-10) IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED ON 12/01/2024, AS PER RULE 34 OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RULE 1963. SD/- SD/- (PAWAN SINGH) (DR. A.L. SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SURAT / / DATE: 12/01/2021 /# SGR COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO 1. THE ASSESSEE 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT(A) 4. PR.CIT 5. DR/AR, ITAT, SURAT 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER / / TRUE COPY / / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR/SR. PS/PS ITAT, SURAT