THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member And Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal, Judicial Member Th e DCIT, Central Circle-3, 603, 6 t h F lo or, Aayakar Bhavan , Race Cou rse Circle, Vadodara-3 90007 (Appellant) Vs M/s. Ultratech Trans mi s sion P vt. Ltd , GF -1, Radhak rishna Flat, Plot No. -7 , Shanti Nik etan, S OC Nr. ESI Ho spital, Op p. Haveli Productivity Road, Alkapuri, Vadodara PAN: AABCU375 1A (Resp ondent) Asses see b y : Shri S. N. Sopa rkar, A.R. Revenue by : Shri Atul Pandey , S r. D. R. Date of hearing : 06-10 -2 022 Date of pronouncement : 16-11 -2 022 आदेश/ORDER PER : SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Ahmedabad vide order dated 17/12/2018 passed for the assessment year 2015-16. ITA No. 400 /Ahd/2019 Assessment Year 2015-16 I.T.A No. 400/Ahd/2019 A.Y. 2015-16 Page No. DCIT Vs. M/s. Ultra Tech Transmission Pvt. Ltd. 2 2. At the outset, after going through the grounds of appeal and the impugned orders of the Revenue authorities below, a query was raised by the Bench as to applicability and maintainability of the appeal filed by the Revenue in view of recent CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8.8.2019 restricting the filling of the appeal by the Revenue where the tax effect is below Rs.50 lakhs, the ld. DR did not dispute the same and submitted that the issue is left to the Tribunal to be decided in accordance with law. 3. We find that the appeal of the Revenue is presented on 8.3.2019. On 8.8.2019 the CBDT has issued Instructions bearing No. 17 of 2019 prohibiting its subordinate authorities from filing of the appeal to the Tribunal against the order of the CIT(A) where the tax effect by virtue of the relief given by the CIT(A) is less than Rs.50 lakhs. The instructions have been made applicable with retrospective effect, meaning thereby, these instructions are applicable on pending appeals also. In the present case, “tax effect” on the total income assessed minus the tax that would have been chargeable had such total income been reduced by the amount of income in respect of the issue against which appeal is filed, is less than Rs.50 lakhs. Further, the case of the Revenue does not fall within the ambit of exceptions provided in the Circular. Thus, keeping in view the above CBDT circular and provisions of section 268A of the Income Tax Act, we are of the view that the present appeal of the Revenue deserves to be dismissed. It is accordingly dismissed. However, it is observed that in case on re-verification at the end of the AO it comes to the notice that the tax effect is more or Revenue’s case falls I.T.A No. 400/Ahd/2019 A.Y. 2015-16 Page No. DCIT Vs. M/s. Ultra Tech Transmission Pvt. Ltd. 3 within the ambit of exceptions provided in the Circular, then the Department will be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for recall of this order. Such application should be filed within the time period prescribed in the Act. In view of the above, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect. 4. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 16-11-2022 Sd/- Sd/- (WASEEM AHMED) (SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Ahmedabad : Dated 16/11/2022 आदेश क त ल प अ े षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. Assessee 2. Revenue 3. Concerned CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. Guard file. By order/ आदेश से, उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, अहमदाबाद