INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2-3, JAIPUR V. SHRI RAJESH BANSAL, JAIPUR

ITA 401/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9482 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 11 month(s) 23 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-03-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 22-03-2019
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MONISHA CHOUDHARYADDL
• Assessee Lawyers: MANISH AGARWAL CA DHK
• Section: 22

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES A, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 401/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 I.T.O., WARD 2(3), JAIPUR. CUKE VS. SH. RAJESH BANSAL, S-20, PARWATI CHAMBER, KARTARPURA INDUSTRIAL AREA, 22 GODAM, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AGVPB 4563 E VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY(ADDL.CIT) FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY: SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (CA) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 12/03/2021 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 15/03/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A), KOTA DATED 19/12/2018 FOR THE A.Y. 2014-15. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED AN APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION MADE IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: KINDLY REFER TO THE CAPTIONED APPEAL FIXED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE HONBLE BENCH ON 12/03/2021. ITA 401/JP/2019_ ITO VS SH. RAJESH BANSAL 2 IN THE MATTER, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT FORM 3 IS ISSUED BY THE CIT IN RESPONSE TO APPLICATION IN FORM 1 & 2 UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME BY THE ASSESSEE, COPY OF FORM 3 ENCLOSED. IT IS THEREFORE, HUMBLY REQUESTED TO PLEASE ALLOW THE APPELLANT TO WITHDRAW THE PRESENT APPEAL. INCONVENIENCE CAUSED IS EXTREMELY REGRETTED. THANKING YOU, YOURS FAITHFULLY, (MANISH AGARWAL) A/R 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THIS APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15 TH MARCH, 2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 15/03/2021 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: ITA 401/JP/2019_ ITO VS SH. RAJESH BANSAL 3 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- THE I.T.O., WARD 2(3), JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- SHRI RAJESH BANSAL, JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 401/JP/2019) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR