Fredy Chrispino D'souza, Colva V. ITO, Ward - 2, Margao

ITA 409/PAN/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6112 (ITAT-PANAJI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 11 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 25-09-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 10-10-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SURENDRA DHAKA
• Assessee Lawyers: SHRINIVAS NAYAK

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH, PANAJI (AT E-COURT, PUNE) BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER . / ITA NO.409/PAN/2018 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 FREDY CHRISPINO DSOUZA, AQUAMARINA, BUNGLOW-D, GRANDE VENELIM, COLVA, GOA 403708. PAN : ADIPD0095R. . / APPELLANT. V/S THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, MARGAO. . / RESPONDENT ASSESSEE BY : SHRI SHRINIVAS NAYAK. REVENUE BY : SHRI SURENDRA DHAKA. / ORDER PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM 1. THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDE R OF LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 2, PANAJI, DATED 28.08 .2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15. 2. IN THIS CASE, THE ASSESSEE HAS MOVED APPLICATION SEEK ING WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FILED BY HIM ON THE GROUND THAT H E HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE INVOLVED IN THE SAID APPEAL UNDER THE D IRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. IT IS ALSO STATED IN THE SAID APPLICATION / DATE OF HEARING : 25.09.2020 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 25.09.2020 2 THAT REQUIRED DECLARATIONS IN THE PRESCRIBED FORM NO.1 AN D FORM NO.2 HAVE BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AND THE DESIGNATED AUTH ORITY HAS ALSO ISSUED CERTIFICATE IN FORM NO.3. THE COPIES OF WHICH ARE ENC LOSED HEREWITH TO THE APPLICATIONS. 3. SHRI SURESH DHAKA, THE LD. DR HAS NO OBJECTION IN CASE THE ASSESSEE WISHES TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. 4. AS ALREADY NOTED, THE ASSESSEE HAS DULY FILED THE DECLA RATIONS IN FORM 1 AND FORM 2 AND THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY HAS ALS O ISSUED THE CERTIFICATE IN FORM 3 AS PER SECTION 5(1) OF THE SCHEME DET ERMINING THE TAX PAYABLE BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER THE SCHEME. ON RECE IPT OF THE SAID CERTIFICATE IN FORM 3, THE ASSESSEE IS NOW SEEKING TO WITHD RAW THIS APPEAL AS REQUIRED UNDER THE SCHEME AND KEEPING IN VIEW THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS DULY COMPLIED WITH THE NECESSARY REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AND DISMISS THE SAME AS WITHDRAWN. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMIS SED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 25 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- ( R.S. SYAL) ( S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) VICEPRESIDENT JUDICIALMEMBER PUNE; DATED : 25 TH SEPTEMBER, 2020. YAMINI 3 /0123431 / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT 3. 4. 5 6. CIT(A) - 2 , PANAJI. PR. CIT, PANAJI. !'# $$%&,( %&, / DR, ITAT, PANAJI PUNE; #*+,/ GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER // TRUE COPY // -./$0%1 / SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY %& , / ITAT, PUNE.