I.T.A .NO.-4092 & 4095/DEL/2014 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: G NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. G.D.AGRAWAL, HONBLE PRESIDENT AND SH.K.N.CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A .NO.-4092 & 4095/DEL/2014 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2007-08) SHYAM M EMORIAL WELFARE SOCIETY, C/O-SH.U.S.AGGARWAL, ADVOCATE, FLAT NO.505, MAITRI APPTTS., SECTOR-9, OPP. METRO PILLAR NO.411, ROHINI, NEW DELHI-110085. PAN-AADAS3814Q ( APPELLANT) VS DCIT, CIRCLE SONEPAT, SONEPAT. (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY NONE REVENUE BY SH. KAUSHLENDRA TIWARI, SR.DR DATE OF HEARING 11.10.2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 11.10.2017 ORDER PER BENCH THESE TWO APPEALS BY ASSESSEE HAVE BEEN DIRECTED A GAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A), ROHTAK DATED 08.05.2014 FOR AY 2007-08. 2. HOWEVER, AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NO ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, IT CAN BE SAFELY PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS IN PURSUING THE PRESENT APP EALS AND HENCE THESE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED IN LIMINE. SUPPORT IS DRAWN FROM THE ORDER OF THE CO-ORDINATE BENCH OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CAS E OF MULTIPLAN INDIA I.T.A .NO.-4092 & 4095/DEL/2014 (P) LTD.; 38 ITD 320 (DEL) AND ORDER OF HONBLE MAD HYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKA R VS. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P). 3. BEFORE PARTING, WE ADD THAT IN CASE THE ASSESSEE IS ABLE TO SHOW THAT THERE WAS A REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NON-REPRESENTATION ON THE DATE OF HEARING, IT WOULD BE AT LIBERTY IF SO DEEMED FIT TO PRAY FOR A RECALL OF THIS ORDER. THE SAID ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED ON THE DATE O F HEARING ITSELF IN THE OPEN COURT. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE D ISMISSED. THE ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 11 TH OF OCTOBER, 2017. SD/- SD/- (K.N.CHARY) (G.D. AGRAWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER PRESIDENT DATE:-11 TH OCTOBER, 2017 *AMIT KUMAR* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSIST ANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI