M/s. Jayalakshmi Indiresan, New Delhi V. ITO, New Delhi

ITA 4126/DEL/2009

• Counselvise Citation: [2009] 115 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2210 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 16-12-2009
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Next Hearing Date: 20-10-2010
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 16-10-2009
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: H K LAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A.NO. 4126/DEL/2009 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07 MRS. JAYALAKSHMI INDIRESAN, B57, HILL VIEW APARTMENT, VASANT VIHAR, NEW DELHI. PAN : AAAPI3345J VS. ITO, WARD 24 (4), NEW DELHI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI H.K.LAL, SR. DR O R D E R PER I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. IT IS DI RECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A), DATED 23 RD SEPTEMBER, 2009 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07. ON THE FIXED DATE OF HEARING I.E., 16 TH DECEMBER, 2009, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. IN THESE CIRCUM STANCES, WE PRESUME THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING HER APPEAL. CONSIDERING THESE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF R ULE 19(2) OF THE ITAT RULES AS WERE CONSIDERED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL) AND M.P.HIGH COURT IN THE C ASE OF LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UNADMITTED. 2. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. 2 3. THE ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 16.12. 2009. SD/- SD/- [SHAMIM YAHYA] [I.P. BANSAL] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : 16.12.2009. DK COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ITAT, DELHI BENCHES