IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT [CONDUCTED THROUGH E-COURT AT AHMEDABAD] BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ ITA NO. 413/RJT/2014 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10 ACIT, CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT VS SHRI JITENDRA R. TANTI, 1 ST FLOOR, AMRUT COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, SARDARNAGAR MAIN ROAD, RAJKOT PAN : AARPT 6364 R / (APPELLANT) / (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY : SHRI D.R. CHHATRE, SR DR ASSESSEE BY : SHRI M.J. RANPURA, AR / DATE OF HEARING : 24/08/2016 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 24/08/2016 / O R D E R PER AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :- THIS APPEAL BY THE REVENUE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS), JAMNAGAR DATED 21.04.2014 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10. 2. THE SOLE GROUND RAISED BY THE REVENUE READS AS U NDER:- THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACT BY DELET ING THE ADDITION OF RS.25,30,553/- DISALLOWED U/S 14A OF THE ACT. 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING BEFORE US, THE LD. AUTHOR IZED REPRESENTATIVE SUBMITTED THAT THE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE REVENUE NE EDS TO BE DISMISSED ON ACCOUNT OF LOW TAX EFFECT IN VIEW OF THE CBDT CIRCU LAR NO.21 OF 2015 DATED 10.12.2015. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FA IRLY ADMITTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN THE LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY THE AFO RESAID CBDT CIRCULAR. 4. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. WE FIND THAT PRIMA-FACIE THIS APPEAL OF TH E REVENUE IS NOT ITA NO. 413/RJT/2014 ACIT VS. SHRI JITENDRA R. TANTI AY : 2009-10 2 MAINTAINABLE IN VIEW OF CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 21/2015 I N F.NO.279/MISC. 142/2007-ITJ (PT) DATED 10TH DECEMBER 2015, VIDE WHI CH IT HAS BEEN PROVIDED THAT IF THE TAX EFFECT BY VIRTUE OF THE CO MMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)S ORDER IS BELOW RS. 10 LACS, THEN THAT O RDER WOULD NOT BE CHALLENGED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IN FURTHER APPEAL. THE BOARD HAS PROVIDED EXEMPTIONS AT CLAUSE (8) OF THE INSTRUCTIONS WHEREI N IT HAS BEEN PROVIDED THAT THESE INSTRUCTIONS WILL NOT BE APPLICABLE, IF VIRES OF ANY PROVISIONS HAS BEEN QUASHED BY IMPUGNED ORDER OR ADDITION WAS MADE ON SOME AUDIT OBJECTIONS OR THE ADDITION RELATES TO UNDISCLOSED F OREIGN ASSETS/BANK ACCOUNTS, ETC. WE FIND THAT THE PRESENT CASE DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE EXEMPTION CLAUSE AND THE TAX IS ADMITTEDLY LESS THA N RS.10 LACS. THEREFORE, THE PRESENT APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE AND HENCE DI SMISSED. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 24 TH AUGUST, 2016 AT AHMEDABAD. SD/- SD/- ( RAJPAL YADAV ) JUDICIAL MEMBER (AMARJIT SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD; DATED 24/08/2016 *BIJU T. / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. / CONCERNED CIT 4. ( ) / THE CIT(A) 5. , / DR, ITAT, RAJKOT 6. / GUARD FILE . / BY ORDER, TRUE COPY / ( DY./ASSTT.REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, RAJKOT