IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT [CONDUCTED THROUGH E-COURT AT AH MEDABAD] BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI, MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A. NO.417/RJT/2015 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12) DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 3(1), RAJKOT. V/S M/S SONPAL EXPORTS PVT. LTD., AMRELI. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN: AAJCS 0177 N APPELLANT BY : SHRI AVINASH KUMAR, SR. D .R. RESPONDENT BY : SHRI VIMAL DESAI, A.R. ( )/ ORDER DATE OF HEARING : 17/04/2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 18/04/2017 PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. THIS APPEAL BY THE REVENUE IS PREFERRED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-I, RAJKOT DATED 25/06/2015 PERTAINING TO A.Y . 2011-12. 2. THE SUBSTANTIVE GRIEVANCE OF THE REVENUE READS AS U NDER:- I. ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN L AW, THE LEARNED CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AND ON FACTS IN DELETING THE DISAL LOWANCE ON ACCOUNT OF EXPORT COMMISSION OF RS.31,79,708/- U/S.40(A)(IA) O F THE I.T. ACT, 1961. ITA NO. 417/RJT/2015 . A.Y. 2011-12 2 II. ANY OTHER GROUND THAT THE REVENUE MAY RAISE BEFORE OR DURING THE PROCEEDING BEFORE THE HONBLE ITAT. III. ON THE FACTS OF THE CASE AND IN LAW, THE LEARNED CI T(A) OUGHT TO HAVE UPHELD THE ORDER OF THE AO. IV. IT IS, THEREFORE, PRAYED THAT THE ORDER OF THE CIT( A), MAY KINDLY BE SET ASIDE AND THAT OF ASSESSING OFFICER BE RESTORED TO THE ABOVE EXTENT. 3. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE SUB MITTED THAT THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE NEEDS TO BE DISMISSED ON ACCOUNT OF LOW TAX EFFECT IN VIEW OF THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO.21 OF 2015 DATED 10.12.2015. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FAIRLY ADMITTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN THE LIMIT PRESCRIBED BY THE AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR. 4. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND PERUSED THE MATE RIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. WE FIND THAT PRIMA-FACIE THIS APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN VIEW OF CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 21/2015 I N F.NO.279/MISC. 142/2007-ITJ (PT) DATED 10TH DECEMBER 2015, VIDE WH ICH IT HAS BEEN PROVIDED THAT IF THE TAX EFFECT BY VIRTUE OF THE CO MMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)S ORDER IS BELOW RS. 10 LACS, THEN THAT O RDER WOULD NOT BE CHALLENGED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IN FURTHER APPEAL. THE BOARD HAS PROVIDED EXEMPTIONS AT CLAUSE (8) OF THE INSTRUCTIONS WHEREI N IT HAS BEEN PROVIDED THAT THESE INSTRUCTIONS WILL NOT BE APPLICABLE, IF VIRES OF ANY PROVISIONS HAS BEEN QUASHED BY IMPUGNED ORDER OR ADDITION WAS MADE ON SOME AUDIT OBJECTIONS OR THE ADDITION RELATES TO UNDISCLOSED F OREIGN ASSETS/BANK ACCOUNTS, ETC. WE FIND THAT THE PRESENT CASE DOES NOT FALL WITHIN THE EXEMPTION CLAUSE AND THE TAX IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAC S. THEREFORE, THE PRESENT APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE AND HENCE DISMISSED. ITA NO. 417/RJT/2015 . A.Y. 2011-12 3 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE I S DISMISSED IN LIMINE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 18/04/2017 SD/- SD/- (MANISH BORAD) (MAHAVIR PRASAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMEDABAD: 18/04/2017 PRITI COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: - 1. THE APPELLANT. 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT (APPEALS) I, RAJKOT. 4. THE CIT CONCERNED. 5. THE DR., ITAT, AHMEDABAD. 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER DEPUTY/ASSTT.REGISTRAR ITAT,RAJKOT TRUE COPY