DCIT-12(2)(1), MUMBAI V. M/S.ENTRUST ENVIRONMENT LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 4199/MUM/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 115 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6289 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 3 month(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-10-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: E
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 15-06-2018
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: AMIT PRATAP SINGH
• Assessee Lawyers: AVIN JAIN
• Keywords: Tax effect
• Section: 143(3)

Judgement Text

P A G E | 1 ITA NO.4199/MUM/2018 A.Y. 2012 - 13 DCIT - 12(2)(1) VS. M/S ENTRUST ENVIRONMENT LTD. IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH E MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI G.MANJUNATHA (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD (JUDICIAL MEMBER) ITA NO. 4199/MUM/2018 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2012 - 13) DCIT 12(2) (1), ROOM NO. 223 , 2 ND FLOOR , AAYAKAR BHAVAN, M.K. ROAD, MUMBAI 20 VS. M/S ENTRUST ENVIRONMENT LTD. UNIPHOS HOUSE, 11 TH ROAD, MADHU PARK, KHAR (WEST) MUMBAI - 400052 PAN NO. AABCE5948B APPELLANT RESPONDENT REVENUE BY : MR. AMIT PRATAP SINGH , D.R ASSESSEE BY : MR. AVIN JAIN , A.R DATE OF HEARING : 10/10 /2019 DAT E OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 1 0 /1 0 /2019 ORDER PER RAVISH SOOD, JM THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE. THE APPEAL IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMIS SIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - 20 , MUMBAI [IN SHORT CIT(A)] AND ARISES OUT OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961, (THE ACT). 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES (CBDT ) VIDE CIRCULAR NO. 17/2019 DATED 08.08.2019 HAS AMENDED CIRCULAR NO. 3/2018 DATED 11.07.2018 FOR FURTHER ENHANCEMENT OF MONETARY LIMIT FOR FILING OF APPEALS BY THE DEPARTMENT BEFORE THE ITAT, HIGH COURTS AND SLPS/APPEALS BEFORE SUPREME COURT AS MEASURES F OR REDUCING LITIGATION. 3. CBDT VIDE CIRCULAR NO. 3/2018 DATED 11.07.2018 HAS SPECIFIED THAT APPEALS SHALL NOT BE FILED BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (ITAT) IN CASES WHERE THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE MONETARY LIMIT OF RS.20,00,000/ - . FOR THIS PURCHASE, TAX EFFECT MEANS TH E DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TAX ON THE TOTAL INCOME ASSESSED AND THE TAX THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGEABLE HAD SUCH TOTAL INCOME BEEN REDUCED BY THE AMOUNT OF INCOME IN RESPECT OF ISSUES AGAINST WHICH APPEAL IS INTENDED TO BE FILED. FURTHER, TAX EFFECT SHALL BE TAXES INCLUDING APPLICABLE SURCHARGE AND CESS. HOWEVER, THE TAX WILL NOT P A G E | 2 ITA NO.4199/MUM/2018 A.Y. 2012 - 13 DCIT - 12(2)(1) VS. M/S ENTRUST ENVIRONMENT LTD. INCLUDE ANY INTEREST THEREON, EXCEPT WHERE CHARGEABILITY OF INTEREST ITSELF IS IN DISPUTE. IN CASE THE CHARGEABILITY OF INTEREST IS THE ISSUE UNDER DISPUTE, THE AMOUNT OF INTEREST SHALL BE THE TAX EFFECT. IN CASES WHERE RETURNED LOSS IS REDUCED OR ASSESSED AS INCOME, THE TAX EFFECT WOULD INCLUDE NOTIONAL TAX ON DISPUTED ADDITIONS. IN CASE OF PENALTY ORDER, THE TAX EFFECT WILL MEAN QUANTUM OF PENALTY DELETED OR REDUCED IN THE ORDER T O BE APPEALED AGAINST. AT PARA 13 OF THE ABOVE CIRCULAR, IT HAS BEEN MENTIONED THAT: 13. THIS CIRCULAR WILL APPLY TO SLPS/APPEALS/CROSS OBJECTION/REFERENCES TO BE FILED HENCEFORTH IN SC/HCS/TRIBUNAL AND IT SHALL ALSO APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO PENDING SL PS/APPEALS/CROSS OBJECTIONS/REFERENCES. PENDING APPEALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED TAX LIMITS IN PARA 3 ABOVE MAY BE WITHDRAWN/NOT PRESSED. 4. AS A STEP TOWARDS FURTHER MANAGEMENT OF LITIGATION, CBDT VIDE CIRCULAR NO. 17/2019 HAS FIXED THE MONETARY LIMIT FOR FIL ING OF APPEALS BEFORE ITAT AT RS.50,00,000/ - . 5. IN THE INSTANT APPEAL FILED BY THE DEPARTMENT, THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IS BELOW THE MONETARY LIMIT OF RS.50,00,000/ - . THE SAME WAS BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (DR) AND THE L D. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE. 6. BEFORE US, THE LD. DR SUBMITS THAT LIBERTY MAY KINDLY BE GIVEN TO RAISE, AFTER NECESSARY FURTHER VERIFICATION, AND TO SEEK RECALL THE DISMISSAL OF APPEAL AND RESTORATION OF THE APPEAL IN CASE IT CAN BE SHOWN THAT THE APPEAL IS COVERED BY THE EXCEPTIONS. 7. WE AGREE WITH THE ABOVE CONTENTIONS OF THE LD. DR AND MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THE APPELLANT SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO POINT OUT THE EXCEPTIONS AND WE WILL TAKE APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL MEASURES IN THIS REGARD. 8. WITH THE ABOVE OBSERV ATIONS, THIS APPEAL INVOLVING TAX EFFECT OF LESS THAN RS.50,00,000/ - IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 1 0 /10 /2019. S D / - S D / - ( G. MANJUNATHA ) ( RAVISH SOOD ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI ; DATED: 1 0 /10 /2019 ROHIT, P.S. P A G E | 3 ITA NO.4199/MUM/2018 A.Y. 2012 - 13 DCIT - 12(2)(1) VS. M/S ENTRUST ENVIRONMENT LTD. COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(A) - 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE . BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// (SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY) ITAT, MUMBAI