Shri Ram Diya Contractor, Kaithal V. ITO, Kurukshetra

ITA 425/CHANDI/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2011] 134 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5330 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 1 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 27-07-2011
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 20-07-2011
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 25-04-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: JAI SHREE SHARMA
• Assessee Lawyers: RAVINDER BINDLISH

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL: B BENCH: CH ANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI D K SRIVASTAVA, AM AND MS. SUSHMA CHOWL A, JM ITA NO. 425/CHANDI/2011 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 SHRI RAM DIYA CONTRACTOR V. I.T.O. WARD -1, KURU KSHETRA VILLAGE MAJRA P.P REHRA, KAITHAL PAN: AEYPD 2470 D APPELLANT BY: SHRI RAVINDER BINDLISH RESPONDENT BY: SMT. JAISHREE SHARMA ORDER D K SRIVASTAVA: AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE LD. AUTHORISED REPRESEN TATIVE FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED A LETTER DATED 18.7.2011 WHI CH READS AS UNDER:- THE APPEAL IN THE CASE CITED AS SUBJECT HAS BEEN F ILED AND DISPOSED OFF BY THE HONBLE ITAT IN ITA NO. 308/CHANDI/2011. THE PRESE NT PENDING APPEAL NO. 425/11 HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE BY MISTAKE UN WONTEDLY. IT IS, THEREFORE, MOST HUMBLY AND RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED THAT THIS AP PEAL MAY KINDLY BE FILED AND VACATED TREATING THE SAME TO BE INFRUCTUOUS. 2. HE SUBMITTED THAT THE PRESENT APPEAL SHOULD BE D ISMISSED AS IT IS INFRUCTUOUS FOR THE REASONS GIVEN IN THE AFORESAID LETTER. IN T HIS VIEW OF THE MATTER, THE APPEAL FIELD BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 27 JULY 2011 SD/- SD/- (SUSHMA CHOWLA) (D K SRIVA STAVA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEM BER CHANDIGARH: THE JULY 2011 SURESH COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT, SHRI RAM DIYA CONTRACTOR 2. THE RESPONDENT, I.T.O. WARD -1, KURUKSHETRA 3. THE CIT(A), KARNAL 4. THE LD. CIT, KARNAL 5. THE D.R, INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENT, CHANDIGARH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH