Anjali Suppliers Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata V. I.T.O.,Ward-12(1), Kolkata

ITA 431/KOL/2019

AI Insights

The case involves Anjali Suppliers Pvt. Ltd., which appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-15, dated 06.12.2018, for the assessment year 2012-13. The primary issue in the appeal was the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) without considering the merits of the case, as the assessee did not receive the notice for the hearing. The assessee's representative submitted an affidavit stating the non-receipt of the notice, which was the reason for their absence at the hearing. The Departmental Representative argued that the assessee did not respond on the designated date, and thus the ex-parte order was justified. The Tribunal, prioritizing substantial justice over technicalities, decided to restore the appeal to the CIT(A) for a fresh hearing.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 127397 (ITAT-KOLKATA)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 5 month(s) 17 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-08-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: PartlyAllowed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 31-07-2023
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 05-03-2019
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 144

Judgement Text

आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ “सी’’, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH: KOLKATA ी राजेश क ु मार, लेखा सद य एवं ी संजय शमा या यक सद य के सम [Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member &Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member] I.T.A. No. 431/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Anjali Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. (PAN: AAJCA 1784 D) Vs. ITO, Ward-12(1), Kolkata Appellant / (अपीलाथ ) Respondent / ( !यथ ) Date of Hearing / स ु नवाई क$ त&थ 01.08.2023 Date of Pronouncement/ आदेश उ)घोषणा क$ त&थ 22.08.2023 For the Appellant/ नधा /रती क$ ओर से Shri Miraj D Shah, A.R For the Respondent/ राज व क$ ओर से Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwala, CITDR ORDER / आदेश Per Rajesh Kumar, AM: This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-15 (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 06.12.2018 for the AY 2012-13. 2. Issue raised in second grounds of appeal by the assessee is against the order of Ld. CIT(A) passing ex-parte order without considering the merit of the case. 3. At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee filed an affidavit of Ramgopal Prajapat dated 12.12.2022 which states that the assessee could not appear before the Ld. CIT(A) on the date designated for hearing because the notice issued by the Ld. CIT(A) was not served on the assessee. The Ld. A.R therefore prayed that in the 2 I.T.A. No.431/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Anjali Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. interest of justice and fair play the appeal may kindly be restored to the file of Ld. CIT(A) and the same should be decided after hearing the assessee on merit. 3. The Ld. D.R on the other hand submitted that the assessee has not responded on the date of hearing and therefore the arguments are devoid of any force. The ld DR stated that even before the AO the assessment was framed u/s 144 of the Act and the same is position before the Ld. CIT(A). 4. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the material on record, we find that the order has been passed by the Ld. CIT(A) ex-parte on the back of the assessee when the assessee failed to appear on the date fixed for hearing and thus disposed off the case on the basis of material available before him. We have perused the Affidavit filed before us and find reason for non-appearance was non service of notice issued by the Ld. CIT(A) to the assessee. In our opinion, substantial justice should prevail over the technicalities and assessee should not be denied justice for frivolous reasons which were beyond the control of the assessee. In the present case we observe that notice was not served on the assessee resulting into the Ld. CIT(A) deciding the appeal ex-parte. Under the present circumstances we are of view that ends of justice would be met if the matter is restored to the file of Ld. CIT(A) to decide the same afresh after reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Accordingly we restoire the appeal to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) and simultaneously direct the assessee to co- operate by filing the records/evidences as called for by the appellate authority. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order is pronounced in the open court on 22 nd August, 2023 Sd/- Sd/- (Sonjoy Sarma /संजय शमा ) (Rajesh Kumar/राजेश क ु मार) Judicial Member/ या यक सद य Accountant Member/लेखा सद य Dated: 22 nd August, 2023 SB, Sr. PS 3 I.T.A. No.431/Kol/2019 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Anjali Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant- Anjali Suppliers Pvt. Ltd., 2E, Cornfield Road, Ground Floor, Kolkata-700019. 2. Respondent – ITO, Ward-12(1), Kolkata 3. Ld. CIT(A)- 15, Kolkata 4. Ld. PCIT- , Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail) True Copy By Order Assistant Registrar ITAT, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata