Darshita Packaging Products, Dadra & Nagar Haveli V. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Now Silvassa Ward, Dadra & Nagar Haveli

ITA 437/AHD/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8188 (ITAT-SURAT)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 year(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 19-03-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 24-02-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: ANUPAMA SINGLA

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR.SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (VIRTUAL HEARING) . . ./ I.T.A NO.437/AHD/2016 [ [ / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2008-09 M/S.DARSHITA PACKAGING PRODUCTS, GALA NO.16, ZERO TAX INDUSTRY ESTATE, DADRA, SILVASSA. [PAN: AAEFD 2337 H] VS . THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VAPI. / APPELLANT /RESPONDENT [ /ASSESSEE BY SHRI BIPIN JARIWALA ADV. /REVENUE BY MS. ANUPAMA SINGLA SR.DR / DATE OF HEARING: 1 9 . 0 3 .20 2 1 /PRONOUNCEMENT ON: 1 9 . 0 3 .202 1 /O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMEBER: 1. THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)-VALSAD, VALSAD DATED 03.12.2015 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR (AY) 2008-09. 2. THE APPEAL CAME UP HEARING ON 19 TH MARCH 2021. THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY FILED AN APPLICATION DATED 15.03.2021 CONTENDING THEREIN THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS SETTLED DISPUTE WITH THE DEPARTMENT UNDER VIVAD-SE-VISHWAS SCHEME2020 AND HAD ALREADY RECEIVED FORM-3, ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VALSAD, DATED 27.01.2021 COPY OF WHICH IS FILED. THE LD.AUTHORISED DARSHITA PACKAGING PRODUCTS VS. ITO, WARD-1, VAPI ./ ITA NO.437/AHD/2016 FOR A.Y. 2008-09 2 REPRESENTATIVE(AR) FOR ASSESSEE AT THE TIME OF HEARING PRAYED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. 3. THE LD.DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE /SR.DR APPEARING FOR THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. CONSIDERING THE CONTENTS OF THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN BEING SETTLED. RESULTANTLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. THE AO IS DIRECTED TO PASS CONSEQUENTIAL ORDER AS PER CBDT CIRCULAR NO.3/2021 DATED 04.03.2021. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 19 TH MARCH 2021 AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF APPEAL. SD/- SD/- (DR.ARJUN LAL SAINI) (PAWAN SINGH) ( /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ( /JUDICIAL MEMBER) / SURAT, DATED : 19 TH MAR 2021 / #SGR COPY OF ORDER SENT TO- ASSESSEE/AO/PR. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/GUARD FILE OF ITAT. BY ORDER / / TRUE COPY / / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, SURAT