The DCIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Ahmedabad V. Marck Biosciences Ltd., Ahmedabad

ITA 44/AHD/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5103 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 6 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-08-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: Not Allotted
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 05-01-2017
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Retrospective amendment; Tax effect
• Section: 68

Judgement Text

, - IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD BENCH C BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ ITA NO. 44/AHD/2017 / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2012-13 DCIT, CIR.1(1)(1) AHMEDABAD. VS MARCK BIOSCIENCES LTD.(NOW KNOWN AS AMANTA HEALTHCARE LTD.) 5 TH FLOOR, HERITAGE OFF ASHRAM ROAD AHMEDABAD 380 014. / (APPELLANT) / (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY : SHRI MUDIT NAGPAL, SR.DR ASSESSEE BY : MS.URVASHI SHODHAN, AR / DATE OF HEARING : 26/07/2018 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 01/08/2018 O R D E R PER RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER : REVENUE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD.CIT (A) DATED 21.10.2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 CHALLENGING DELETIO N OF ADDITION UNDER SECTION 68 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961. 2. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD.COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE F OR THE ASSESSEE POINTED OUT THAT THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINA BLE IN VIEW OF RECENT CBDT CIRCULAR NO.3/2018 DATED 11.7.2018 RESTRICTING THE FILLING OF THE APPEAL BY THE REVENUE WHERE THE TAX EFFECT IS BELOW RS.20 LAKH. THE TAX EFFECT ON THE DISPUTED ADDITION IS BELOW RS.20 LAKH S, THEREFORE, APPEAL OF ITA NO.44/AHD/2017 - 2 - THE REVENUE IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED. LD.DR DID NO T DISPUTE THE SUBMISSIONS OF LD.COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE, BUT SUB MITTED THAT THE ISSUE IS LEFT TO THE TRIBUNAL TO BE DECIDED IN ACCORDANCE W ITH LAW. 3. WE FIND THAT THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS PRESEN TED ON 5.1.2017. ON 8.1.2016 THE CBDT HAS ISSUED INSTRUCTIONS BEARING N O. 3 OF 2018 UNDER FILE NO.F.NO.279/MISC.142/2007-ITJ(PT) PROHIBITING ITS SUBORDINATE AUTHORITIES FROM FILING OF THE APPEAL TO THE TRIBUN AL AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) WHERE THE TAX EFFECT BY VIRTUE OF THE RELIEF GIVEN BY THE CIT(A) IS LESS THAN RS.20 LAKHS. THE INSTRUCTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE APPLICABLE WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT, MEANING THEREBY, THESE INSTRU CTIONS ARE APPLICABLE ON PENDING APPEALS ALSO. IN THE PRESENT CASE, THE DIS PUTED ADDITION IS OF RS.43,00,000/-, AND THEREFORE, THE TAX EFFECT AS PER CBDT CIRCULAR IS TAX ON THE TOTAL INCOME ASSESSED MINUS THE TAX THAT WOU LD HAVE BEEN CHARGEABLE HAD SUCH TOTAL INCOME BEEN REDUCED BY TH E AMOUNT OF INCOME IN RESPECT OF THE ISSUE AGAINST WHICH APPEAL IS FIL ED, WOULD BE LESS THAN RS.20 LAKHS. THEREFORE, THE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE R EVENUE IS HIT BY THE CBDT CIRCULAR AND HENCE NOT MAINTAINABLE. FURTHER, LD.DR HAS NOT POINTED OUT WHETHER THE CASE OF THE REVENUE FALL WI THIN THE AMBIT OF EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED IN THE CIRCULAR OR NOT. THUS, KEEPING IN VIEW THE ABOVE CBDT CIRCULAR AND PROVISIONS OF SECTION 268A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE PRESENT APPEAL OF THE REVENUE DESERVES TO BE DISMISSED. IT IS ACCORDINGLY DISMISSED. HOWEVER, IT IS OBSERVED THAT IN CASE ON RE-VERIFICA TION AT THE END OF THE AO IT COMES TO THE NOTICE THAT THE TAX EFFECT I S MORE OR REVENUES CASE FALLS WITHIN THE AMBIT OF EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED IN TH E CIRCULAR, THEN THE DEPARTMENT WILL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBU NAL FOR RECALL OF THIS ITA NO.44/AHD/2017 - 3 - ORDER. SUCH APPLICATION SHOULD BE FILED WITHIN THE TIME PERIOD PRESCRIBED IN THE ACT. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE APPEAL OF TH E REVENUE IS DISMISSED DUE TO LOW TAX EFFECT. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 1 ST AUGUST, 2018. SD/- (WASEEM AHMED) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SD/- (RAJPAL YADAV) JUDICIAL MEMBER