Pune Mumbai Realty, Pune V. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle -4, Pune

ITA 441/PUN/2020

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7360 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 9 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-04-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 29-06-2020
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SHRI
• Section: 64; 13

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, PUNE (THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT) BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, J UDICIAL MEMBER SL. NO. ITA NO. NAME OF APPELLANT NAME OF RESPONDENT ASST. YEAR 1 441/PUN/2020 PUNE MUMBAI REALTY, 10 TH FLOOR, KUMAR BUSINESS CENTER, BUND GARDEN ROAD, PUNE - 411001 PAN : AAJFP9373J DY. CIT, CIRCLE - 4, PUNE 2011 - 12 2 223/PUN/2020 M/S. SAMRUDDHI ENTERPRISES, 376, RAVIVAR PETH, PUNE - 411004 PAN : ABJFS7168R ITO, WARD - 6(1), PUNE 2011 - 12 3 2064/PUN/2019 SHEETAL ADINATH KETKALE, PLOT NO. 111, SECTOR A, PHASE 1, SHRI LAXMI INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, HATKANANGALE - 416109 PAN : ABUPK3324N DY. CIT, ICHALKARANJI CIRCLE, ICHALKARANJI 2010 - 11 4 1099/PUN/2019 SUDHAKAR DEVAPPA MANERE, KABNOOR, TAL. - HATKANANGALE, DIST. - KOLHAPUR - 416117 PAN : AAZPM7738C ITO, WARD - 4, ICHALKARANJI 2011 - 12 5 1512/PUN/2018 MR. DIPAK VISHNU PAWAR, A/P CHIKHALI, GUHAGAR, RATNAGIRI - 415612 PAN : ABXPP7412R ACIT, RATNAGIRI CIRCLE, RATNAGIRI 2014 - 15 6 1946/PUN/2018 VELOX AUTOMATION PVT. LTD., (FORMERLY : M/S. COTMAC ELECTRONICS (SURAT) PVT. LTD., S. NO. 169/2 ABOVE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA, AKURDI, PUNE - 35 PAN : AAACC7599M ITO, WARD - 8(4), PUNE 2012 - 13 ASSESSEE BY SL. NO. 1 TO 6 NONE REVENUE BY SL. NO. 1 , 2 , 3 SHRI VITTHAL BHOSALE SL. NO. 4, 5 & 6 SHRI MAHADEVAN A.M. KRISHANAN DATE OF HEARING 05 - 04 - 2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 05 - 04 - 2021 2 / ORDER THESE SIX APPEALS BY DIFFERENT ASSESSEES FOR THE DIFFERENT ASSESSMENT YEARS MENTIONED IN THE CAPTION ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDERS OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS). 2. IN ITA NO.441/PUN/2020 AND ITA NO. 1099/PUN/2019 THE APPEALS WERE FILED WITH A DELAY OF 64 DAYS AND 313 DAYS, RESPECTIVELY. BOTH THE ASSESSEES FILED AN AFFIDAVIT EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR DELAY , UPON EXAMINING THE AFFIDAVIT IN ITA NO.1099/PUN/2019 AND HEARING THE LD. DR IN BOTH THE APPEALS , WE FIND THAT THE REASONS ARE BONAFIDE WHICH REALLY PREVENTED THE ASSESSEES TO FILE THE PRESENT APPEALS IN TIME. THEREFORE, THE DELAY IN BOTH THE APPEALS ARE CONDONED. 3. WE FIND THAT ALL THE ASSESSEES WISH TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS IN VIEW OF HAVING FILE D APPLICATIONS UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME PROOF OF WHICH THE FORM NO. 3 IS ENCLOSED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. 4. THE LD. DR HAS NO OBJECTION IN CASE ALL THE ASSESSEES WISH TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS. 5. IN VIEW OF THE REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEES ALL THE AP PEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 05 TH APRIL, 202 1 . SD/ - SD/ - ( R.S. SYAL ) ( S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI ) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER / PUNE; / DATED : 05 TH APRIL, 202 1 . RK 3 / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT. 2. / THE RESPONDENT. 3. ( ) / THE CIT(A) CONCERNED 4. / THE CIT CONCERNED 5. , , , / DR, ITAT, B BENCH, PUNE. 6. / GUARD FILE. // // TRUE COPY// / BY ORDER, / PRIVATE SECRETARY, , / ITAT, PUNE