IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJAR I, AM & SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, JM ITA NO. 443 /COCH/201 8 : ASST.YEAR 2010 - 2011 SMT.ANCY GEORGE VALY PROP : SUPREME RUBBER CO. KOORALY P.O. KOTTAYAM 686 522 . PAN : ACRPV5018Q . VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 KOTTAYAM. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : --- NONE --- RESPONDENT BY : SMT.A.S.BINDHU, SR.DR DATE OF HEARING : 13 .03.2019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 13 .03.2019 O R D E R PER GEORGE GEORGE K., JM THIS APPEAL AT THE INSTANCE OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST CIT(A)S ORDER DATED 09.07.2018 . THE RELEVANT ASSESSMENT YEAR IS 2010 - 2011 . 2. WHEN THIS APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING TODAY, NONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPL ICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN FILED. THE NOTICE OF HEARING HAS BEEN ISSUED TO THE ASSESSEE AT THE GIVEN ADDRESS. IT IS, THEREFORE, PRESUMED THAT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING HER APPEAL. HENCE, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR NON - PROSECUTION, BY FOLLOWING THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR V. CWT [(1997) 223 ITR 480 (MP)] AND THE DECISION OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN ITA NO. 443 / COCH /201 8 . SMT.ANCY GEORGE VALY . 2 CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD. [(1991) 38 ITD 320 ]. HOWEVER, IF THE ASSESSEE SO DESIRES, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE AN APPLICATION TO THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER, AFTER EXPLAINING REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NON - APPEARANCE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL ON THE DATE OF HEARING. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 13 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 . SD/ - SD/ - ( CHANDRA POOJARI ) ( GEORGE GEORGE K. ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER COCHIN ; DATED : 13 TH MARCH, 2019 . DEVDAS* COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER, AR - ITAT - COCHIN 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE PR. CIT KOTTAYAM 4. THE CIT(A), KOTTAYAM. 5. THE DR, ITAT, COCHIN. 6 . GUARD FILE.